pandeiro

7 ms·

1.
by pandeiro 9mo ago
Use it all the time. Occasional hiccups.
2.
by pandeiro 1y ago
Vulture Capitalists, obviously
3.
by pandeiro 2y ago
There's no hot reload in Android (kotlin) dev? Wow
4.
by pandeiro 2y ago
Get out of this thread and never come back.
5.
by pandeiro 2y ago
I'm using Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct. BTW it's a great project and I see it's gotten massive adoption on Github, with plenty of Issues to follow. Curse of success! Thanks again. EDIT: Created an Issue for it, probably a more ap
6.
by pandeiro 2y ago
Your tool is really cool, thanks for making it and sharing. I notice that a lot of times, the multi-line output I get from my prompts is truncated or the model just aborts or something. The exit code is still 0 but it seems like something w
7.
by pandeiro 2y ago
I remember that, too, and switched to IE for the next X years
8.
by pandeiro 2y ago
Can't believe unfettered greed and self-interest would ruin something like this.
9.
by pandeiro 2y ago
Another update: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cdk-global-ou...
10.
by pandeiro 2y ago
Reasonable approach and I applaud your effort to maintain the site's purpose while also not ignoring these issues (that do have some relation to the tech industry, as we've seen). Thank you.
11.
by pandeiro 3y ago
One man's politically biased is another's politically astute.
12.
by pandeiro 3y ago
The die hard masking advocate is your example? Wow
13.
by pandeiro 3y ago
Especially when they're factchecking for partisan narrative compliance
14.
by pandeiro 3y ago
lol just go along with it, we need to label them something, and "non-partisan" just doesn't give anyone a self-righteous dopamine hit
15.
Why Denali's Park Road Is Slipping Away(nps.gov)
4 points by pandeiro 4y ago|0 comments
16.
by pandeiro 4y ago
University of California "With this recommendation, the UC Vaccine policy now requires all staff and students to get the bivalent booster, when eligible" [1] https://campusready.ucdavis.edu/covid-vaccination
17.
by pandeiro 4y ago
Re: 'the level of discussion' What you posted was condescending and demonstrative of a large blindspot as to the degree of adverse event surveillance actually being carried out. Hope that helps you achieve the tone of discussion y
18.
by pandeiro 4y ago
Nuts is that on the basis of the flimsiest of evidence, your ascribing an efficacy in disease prevention to an intervention (wearing masks) that was widely understood to do no such thing prior to 2020. Furthermore, respiratory disease avoid
19.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Why not wait until COVID hysteria is over? Seems like the right call.
20.
by pandeiro 5y ago
COVID IFR for your probable age group: 0.05%
21.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Wonder of the number and frequency of these 'surprises' has anything to do with them being trialed and authorized in 3-6 months rather than the standard 6-10 years.
22.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Yeah how did I know the first actual concrete example would involve COVID? jfc
23.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Holy crap reading the replies here I'm really at a loss to imagine what an "UNSAFE and effective" vaccine would look like. "Yeah Bob, got the flu shot yesterday and I can't hear, can't sleep, and can barely wal
24.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Not surprised this degenerated immediately into a mass ranting session about pandemic science with pretty much the entire catalog of cognitive biases and logical fallacies on display. I guess that's interesting to some, from a sociolog
25.
by pandeiro 5y ago
The State is always benevolent and we should always believe and do everything they say. End of story.
26.
by pandeiro 5y ago
You "literally have evidence" that what doesn't happen in humans, ADE in general? Seems pretty easy to disprove; there's a lot of research based on the phenomenon, eg: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc&#x2
27.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Not a dumb question at all. Not a domain expert but an enthusiast so I'll take a crack at an answer: Maximal fire suppression strategies have been the most prevalent approach to avoiding property damage and loss of life caused by fores
28.
by pandeiro 5y ago
So you're saying 'net net', you think the COVID mortality is undercounted? If I had to bet something valuable, I'd take the other side. That's just what seems most probable to me, based on the evidence I cited. Anot
29.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Personally my guess is that COVID was, yes, responsible for the vast majority of those deaths. But I also do think that those cases of overcounting are very likely NOT the only, isolated ones. The dynamics exposed (how hospitalizations were
30.
by pandeiro 5y ago
Aside from the distraction of the author's nuttery, the issue is probably the most salient one for the American middle class over the next century. Either very strong measures are imposed to limit / de-incentivize real estate spec

More ›