pandaxtc

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by pandaxtc 9mo ago

   I completely agree with you on all points. It's terrifying to see these things you've described playing out.
2. 2.▲
   by pandaxtc 10mo ago

   Sorry if I've got this wrong, but wouldn't the first example behave the same way in Javascript as well? The function parent() "awaits" the completion of child(), so it wouldn't be possible to interleave the print st
3. 3.▲
   by pandaxtc 1y ago

   > as a consumer I could care less if you put your soul and years into producing art vs the one I can get a lot of today and now especially when there is virtually no difference in quality as a fellow consumer I care a lot actually
4. 4.▲
   by pandaxtc 1y ago

   This is awesome, I loved the interactivity!
5. 5.▲
   by pandaxtc 2y ago

   This article is awesome, your writing is super approachable and the interactive demos are really cool. I also appreciate the background on how you got into doing this sort of thing.
6. 6.▲
   by pandaxtc 2y ago

   I think the \unicode CSS injection used here was reported to the MathJax library a few months ago - https://github.com/mathjax/MathJax/issues/3129
7. 7.▲
   by pandaxtc 3y ago

   This isn't true, even if you define your own types/classes you still can't add them together willy nilly unless you (or a superclass) explicitly defined an addition operator. The Python language itself will never implicitly c
8. 8.▲
   by pandaxtc 3y ago

   This is something I think is overlooked very often. I feel like a constant narrative I hear is that censoring media like this is a new-fangled concept when in reality this has been standard practice forever.