panbd

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by panbd 1y ago

   It is not open source simply because it does not conform to the OSI definition of open source [1], which is what everyone understands open source to be. This license particularly places restrictions on how the software and derivative works
2. 2.▲
   by panbd 1y ago

   I've actually learned a few little tricks reading the fucking gcc manual. If you're coding C (or C++) regularly, the manual is a good learning source and is well-written.
3. 3.▲
   by panbd 1y ago

   Behold, a free-as-in-beer, source-available program that brands itself as "free and open source". These guys' PR is trying too hard.