pamcake

9 ms·

1.
by pamcake 23d ago
Less granularity could be a middle ground. Show the date but not h/m/s.
2.
by pamcake 29d ago
Do you belive the machine is taking offence? It can not. Telling me, a coder you never met or interacted with before, that I would introduce more bugs than The Product(tm) is pretty rude and prejudiced. > The project author believes that
3.
by pamcake 29d ago
Note: That md file is LLM spew (like most of rest of codebase). https://github.com/pg83/solo/commits/main/README.md https://github.com/pg83/solo/commits/main/
4.
by pamcake 1mo ago
> GH shouldn't have promoted LLM usage the way they have No qualifiers necessary. But try arguing with a lawnmower...
5.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Allowing and accepting? More like encouraging and instigating.
6.
by pamcake 1mo ago
> I was told that the Unified CJK thing adopted a different "philosophy" from the rest of Unicode What would that philosophy be about? Sounds apocryphal. Unicode has never done "unification" like that for other langua
7.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Bonus if also add a .torrent with the same as webseeds: Can make easier for visitor to grab in bulk and makes a way to keep sharing in further future. No strict need to run torrent client to act as webseed - just point at http url.
8.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Now have you met my friend Planck Length?
9.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Why stop there? Give use Wireguard certificate auth already!
10.
by pamcake 1mo ago
"The state apparatus" (or "the state" for short). "State and government" section in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_(polity)
11.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Most likely from above in thread. There is no reason to believe it should be lower than that - or even that low. Or do you have access to research claiming such achievements?
12.
by pamcake 1mo ago
I'm still a bit skeptic - 1000x sounds overly optimistic and only looking at encryption transformation without any operation is already at least 10000x with scheme mentioned in that quote. Sibling comment estimates lower bounds of curr
13.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Benchmarking code in repo: https://github.com/google/heir/tree/main/benchmark Project intro talk from 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqDFdKUTNA4
14.
by pamcake 1mo ago
No we haven't.
15.
by pamcake 1mo ago
I would question why individual police officers would be able to plant pucks administered by the agency and track using (a combination of third-party and) agency infrastructure at will without oversight and properly reviewed papertrail. Nob
16.
by pamcake 1mo ago
So the CFTC frames Kalshi as a financial derivatives exchange for the financial instrument category of event contracts, dismissing NYs characterization of it as a gambling/betting platform. Interesting.
17.
by pamcake 1mo ago
hagezi comment from linked thread: The repo and the account were locked again, so I opened another ticket with GitHub. Their automatic fraud detection is “very frustrating.” No idea how long it will take. Last time, it was bots that reporte
18.
by pamcake 1mo ago
You are right that SSS requires temporarily rematerializing the raw key at the moment of signing. Even so it would be a huge improvement: > Which makes the exact situation that occurred here possible. Not so. The situation here was opera
19.
by pamcake 1mo ago
All of those are pretty specific to US national culture whereas GP is talking about something more global.
20.
by pamcake 1mo ago
> I'm actually too lazy to explain everything now that I'm typing. This will not do. Try harder. I believe in you.
21.
by pamcake 1mo ago
Could be multiple individuals, each with a different key. https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/540 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir%27s_Secret_Sharing
22.
by pamcake 1mo ago
False presumption. You are just making that up, right?
23.
by pamcake 1mo ago
> How do you solve the issues of private key sharings that are stored in cwd .env? Stop putting sensitive stuff there.
24.
by pamcake 1mo ago
https://github.com/pbatard/rufus/releases or https://unetbootin.github.io/#distros
25.
by pamcake 2mo ago
Rejects me too. Not a bot and connecting directly with a "normal" old-fashioned up-to-date web browser. How will you evaluate how many humans vs bots you blocked?
26.
by pamcake 2mo ago
Hey, this one wasnt a fit but i think there are still so many options to consider over doubling down on centralization. Maybe P2P is actually a better fit than federated for git and open source collaboration? nostr, radicle, reticulum? Self
27.
by pamcake 2mo ago
Will you eat your hat? It's not that far from many seemingly popular takes I see on fediverse regularly.
28.
by pamcake 2mo ago
You misunderstand what Codeberg is. Codeberg has 0 paying customers. It is a non-profit providing services for free and not a business. Membership in the non-profit requires fee paid by EU bank transfer and gives voting rights on questions
29.
by pamcake 2mo ago
Anyone using or been trying out Radicle recently? https://radicle.dev EDIT: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147603
30.
by pamcake 3mo ago
Yes you should. It will come naturally if you go down the road of separating code from data and properly isolating dev and prod environments, applying principle of least privilege as you do. .env files for creds are a convenience for dev an

More ›