Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
pabloPXL
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
pabloPXL
12y ago
I wrote another async replacement for browsers, 4.1k minified. https://github.com/aynik/be
2.
▲
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
Right column, top.
3.
▲
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
FTFY: a) http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=express%20js%2C%20rub... b) http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=javascript%2C%20ruby%...
4.
▲
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
Try the standard library: http://golang.org/pkg/
5.
▲
Extending and building Railo 4
(pxl.gg)
1 points
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
This is really cool! Cannot wait for a release with private spaces!
7.
▲
Anonymizer web service with Node.js
(pxl.gg)
4 points
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
by
pabloPXL
14y ago
Apple suing in 3, 2, 1...
9.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
I think both behaviors provide continuation to the problem. On one side, the people who is actually sexist, or racist, or just believe in stereotypes. In the another, the people who also believes that the rest of the people are biased towar
10.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
That's because there is no OOP in javascript as in other languages like java or python, javascript only implements natively prototypal inheritance and lexical scope. This very important concept is always misunderstood because of the syntact
11.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Well, although simpler and less error prone, the 'self' method is quite less optimal than the prototype way. A quick test reveals that the first technique consumes much more memory (100000 new instances pushed into an array): http://imgur.
12.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Never heard of anonymous image boards :?
13.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Thanks! but I can only see it as a bad hack, as it's just grep doing almost all the dirty work :) btw I got the idea from http://zachholman.com and his boom-db...
14.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
hey I did something similar but in pure bash (plus grep and cat) :) https://github.com/pabloPXL/kissdb
15.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Thanks! I didn't know this project and looks pretty awesome :)
16.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Well, given that javascript was designed in somehow less time and with less resources than superior languages it has obviously some inconsistences and everybody agrees on that. On the other side if you know the language really well you can
17.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Well I think that was 'designed' basically to cast any type to it's string representation. Also wanted to point that I used type coercion when is supposed to be used, and never got a bug of that nature in my code, but yes, you must get the
18.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Because in strongly typed languages the compiler is able to hunt down the most of the bugs for you in milliseconds. That's why haskell programmers suggest that if a haskell program compiles gracefully, you can assume is mostly correct and b
19.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
It looks really interesting!
20.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Nice, but wasn't chicken scheme the flagship of scheme-to-c compilers? http://www.call-cc.org/
21.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
I translated it to js -> https://gist.github.com/1679611 Earned 1 line, and packed it with a cheap implementation of zip :3
22.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
I think you didn't make a fair translation from ruby to javascript there, here goes my attempt: function map_unless_nested(arr){ return arr.filter(function(
23.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
No, mainly because there is no such a place.
24.
▲
Jils, expressive javascript.
(reddit.com)
2 points
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
to install it (globally): > npm install -g jils
26.
▲
Jils, a simple lisp implementation for javascript
(github.com)
1 points
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
|
1 comments
27.
▲
Pseudo anonymous functions in cfscript
(gist.github.com)
1 points
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
Created own repo, https://github.com/pabloPXL/kissdb
29.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
^ This is what I mean with my sentence, thanks :)
30.
▲
by
pabloPXL
15y ago
I know perfectly where it comes from, I have access to google too, and the quotes remarked perfectly that the quote was not yours. I was replying to your intention, not to the literal text. EDIT: this reply actually looks more personal than
More ›