ozozozd

4 ms·

1.
by ozozozd 3d ago
> on the Internet nobody knows you’re a terrorist. How does Anthropic know that they are terrorists then? They went off the Internet and confirmed in person?
2.
by ozozozd 3d ago
Linux doesn’t need to publish a dramatic headline multiple times a week. Actually, no other tech company needs that either. But Anthropic craves it.
3.
David Sacks to AI Labs: "Stop pretending you need anyone else's permission"(xcancel.com)
9 points by ozozozd 4d ago|0 comments
4.
by ozozozd 4d ago
Agreed! George Carlin has an amazing show about how language has changed over his lifetime in a different way. You would certainly enjoy it.
5.
by ozozozd 4d ago
Right? It seems at least one of them must not exist.
6.
by ozozozd 4d ago
Have you quit? Are you under duress? If you haven’t quit, or under duress, your comment reads very strange. If I had even a tiny doubt that I didn’t have many “Saturdays I’ll be able to play outside with my kids,” I wouldn’t show up to work
7.
by ozozozd 4d ago
And the source for the claim does not even clear the bar for r/bodybuilding, because it’s “trust me bro.”
8.
by ozozozd 4d ago
Simplest explanation isn’t that they are attempting this well-documented, well-understood corporate tactic? Because believing AI doom is simpler? God complex would be a pretty simple explanation. Regulatory capture isn’t an “elaborate ruse
9.
by ozozozd 4d ago
> In a post on X, he said Anthropic would provide third-party evaluators with “permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment d
10.
by ozozozd 4d ago
This exists and we still put out fire with spraying water? Why do we live in stone age and work on slop machines instead?
11.
by ozozozd 6d ago
Never seen a group of people more addicted to drama. Is this what they call “collective psychosis?”
12.
by ozozozd 7d ago
Why not plug the holes by pretending to attack then? I mean… do we have to hold it wrong?
13.
by ozozozd 7d ago
Why would he sacrifice his pay-off? He is likely around 80% vested after 3 years. He did reduce his tax liability though.
14.
by ozozozd 7d ago
Is the requirement that it’s a fancy new virus? US has 15 to 25 million people unprotected from Polio. Polio is still endemic in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
15.
by ozozozd 8d ago
_It’s not just fantasy, it’s plagiarism._
16.
by ozozozd 8d ago
“Self-sustaining reaction,” like the recursive self improvement? Or perpetual machines? Is physics no longer a main subject at schools?
17.
by ozozozd 8d ago
Chernobyl was “well-contained?” Blue dogs and generations of cancer would disagree.
18.
by ozozozd 8d ago
Erm, hate to break it to you but majority of the world is doing those things at least 50% analog still. What doom?
19.
by ozozozd 8d ago
Terrorist groups with access to resources do not lack the knowledge. In fact, historically they have been trained by professionals. No need for pesky LLMs. It was 90s when I came across txt files describing how to make a bomb on the Interne
20.
by ozozozd 8d ago
Thank you, apparently one of the few grownups in the room.
21.
by ozozozd 8d ago
He is likely 80% vested, and maybe the refresher grant offered was too small, and too high a strike price. Also, with his W2 income his tax liability would be very high for his upcoming stock sale.
22.
by ozozozd 8d ago
What’s the use of AI to a terrorist with, say, nuclear weapons? How does it help with their current blocker? Do they hack FBI, pose as director of FBI and call off their own man-hunt? Do they cut communication within security services? Mili
23.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Hmm, so if you are anti-flock because you were disturbed by the girls swimming pool cameras being viewed hundreds of times by employees and cops, you are also a gang? We are all supposed to be pro-perversion now too?
24.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Let me see if I got this right: - I pay for stuff with my taxes - You add friction to how I access said stuff I paid for - You consider this an “effective distribution” rather than theft I agree with the rest of your comment.
25.
by ozozozd 11d ago
I enjoyed reading this. Hilarious that you thought asking whether I am new to English would be insulting. You could’ve made your point clearer with an example of these non-real-world tests, but I am glad you resorted you ad hominems instead
26.
by ozozozd 11d ago
In other words: hide the evidence of our copyright infringements.
27.
by ozozozd 11d ago
Then the issue is failure to filter copyrighted content for most of the book and only successfully protecting 1 poem.
28.
by ozozozd 12d ago
I can’t personally tolerate the AWS/GCP interfaces and clickops. But in terms of reliability - uptime, product, legal - they are in a different league. There were exactly 0 instances waking up to a product decision at AWS completely br
29.
by ozozozd 12d ago
SWIM
30.
by ozozozd 12d ago
I agree. Though it’s a bit of a self-serving belief, rather than a genuine belief.

More ›