oxydite

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by oxydite 2mo ago

   Damn, dunno why I've always assumed that if something gets a CVE, then some authority has reproduced and verified it. Shouldn't it be CNA's job? Why would anything get a number if it hadn't been verified?
2. 2.▲
   by oxydite 2mo ago

   Well... I can image incentives like health/survival/independence in case of war or other cataclysm. But this is pretty drastic, nothing else comes to mind though
3. 3.▲
   by oxydite 2mo ago

   And it makes sense. If you publish some state-of-the-art algorithm then you're basically helping your competition, and you don't get anything back from them. So you publish bare minimum in small articles on your website, only to g
4. 4.▲
   by oxydite 2mo ago

   Please tell me then how ridiculous my post is. I wanna hear that - that's why I posted this. Your comment did literally nothing useful except bumping your own ego. > You literally did not take 5 minutes to even start Yes you'r
5. 5.▲
   by oxydite 2mo ago

   I wonder how many of you guys actually read this kind of reports (or even skim through)? At the first glance it looks to me like someone just asked an agent for a security review of this CLI and then pasted results to the gist. When I see a