Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
owencm
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
1.
▲
Preact introduced Preact CLI
(npmjs.com)
2 points
by
owencm
9y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Reactive Web Design: techniques for making sites “feel” as good as apps
(medium.com)
1 points
by
owencm
9y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
owencm
10y ago
Co-author of the article here. I agree with dpark - an unstated goal of this proposal was for developers to be able to easily move legacy sites with legacy endpoints to long sessions without needing to update those endpoints or pages. The s
4.
▲
by
owencm
10y ago
Co-author of the article here. An unstated goal (we probably should have stated it, looking back) was for sites to be able to easily move legacy sites with legacy endpoints to long sessions. The service worker approach can effectively inte
5.
▲
by
owencm
10y ago
(Disclaimer: I work on these features on Chrome) We're exploring that. It's not 100% clear either way, but I personally hope we can do it. Feel free to star this issue if you want to keep track of progress: https://bugs
6.
▲
by
owencm
10y ago
Mods - title should read "Native Mac Notifications Behind A Flag in Chrome Stable"
7.
▲
by
owencm
10y ago
http://www.flipkart.com/
8.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
Looks great! Out of interest, does this take advantage of any native features via node or could it also be a website? I'm curious if the motivation of making a desktop app was just for the "installed app user experience" or b
9.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
FWIW Alex Russell wrote a great article about why our current approaches don't work and why this is interesting to explore: https://infrequently.org/2015/08/doing-science-on-the-web/ [Full disclosure: I
10.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
But it's opt out vs opt in which is a huge difference.
11.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
Sites can definitely work offline using the new Service Worker system: http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/service-worker/introd... . Try this example: https://voice-memos.appspot.com .
12.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
That feature was designed but never built, so his point still stands. In my ideal world sites can do that stuff, they just have to ask, and users can always say no.
13.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
Actually, sites in Chrome can work fully offline today using Service Worker ( http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/service-worker/introd... ). And they can get users to add the site to their homescreen, so th
14.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
We try and make sure that the Chromium blog ( http://blog.chromium.org/ ) always covers new features as they make it into the new Beta. Imho you should be able to read the beta blog posts on that blog and not miss any new dev
15.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
Watch the video: it was in 34 generations, each consisting of likely hundreds of attempts. Mod: please edit title appropriately.
16.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
+100
17.
▲
by
owencm
11y ago
This was already possible on desktop using the following flash polyfill: https://github.com/zeroclipboard/zeroclipboard . So on desktop at least this doesn't introduce any new threats, so this seems a little strong
18.
▲
by
owencm
12y ago
FYI there is a public proposal on GitHub for an API which would allow developers to control the banner more, particularly it's timing or suppressing it. Hopefully this will happen soon. https://github.com/slightlyoff&#
19.
▲
Chrome 41 Beta: New ES6 Features and Improved DevTools
(blog.chromium.org)
3 points
by
owencm
12y ago
|
0 comments
20.
▲
How To Assess Your Startup Idea
(owencampbellmoore.com)
1 points
by
owencm
13y ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
I've started a wiki page on Slant.co for people to outline the main arguments why Soylent may or may not be healthy since these threads can be very hard to follow all the great discussion going back and forth! Please help me flesh it out so
22.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
All dislikes on YouTube have disappeared. The link is Gangnam Style showing 8,251,688 likes and 0 dislikes.
23.
▲
All dislikes on YouTube just became likes
(youtube.com)
6 points
by
owencm
13y ago
|
1 comments
24.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
He also specifically mentions 'cloud'. Just saying.
25.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
Just for clarity's sake, I use F5 to flip bits. Your suggestion in 1) makes sense to me, although I've not read of somebody trying this - if you have any more data on it I'd love to see it. 2) This general idea is a good one and the way it
26.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
The whole point of steganography is to not leave any markers. But yes, in theory they could scan them on upload but I'm not exactly sure what their prerogative to do so would be (unless the extension turns out to be used for terrorism that
27.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
OP here. You're precisely correct, the goal of this project was to demonstrate a PoC of a steganography algorithm which can avoid JPEG recompression and is hence suitable for use in walled gardens such as Facebook. Also, Chaffinch is a Camb
28.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
Finding such clips is vital to YouTube's business. Detecting use of steganography isn't vital to Facebook so unless it becomes a very public issue (e.g. is widely used by terrorists) they are highly unlikely to integrate detectors for it. E
29.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
Fundamentally you're correct. Honestly, if I thought this extension was going to be useful to terrorists I wouldn't have released it! In my write-up (linked at the bottom of the article) and also in the instructions it is clear that this is
30.
▲
by
owencm
13y ago
Hundreds of steganography tools already exist for making images which can be shared on any medium where recompression is not an issue ( http://www.jjtc.com/Steganography/tools.html ). In this case I wanted to provide a simple user experienc
More ›