ovciokko

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ovciokko 2mo ago

   contributors are one human and four agents, what an all star team
2. 2.▲
   by ovciokko 6mo ago

   Thanks for your reply. I was wrong in that they are using the Japanese glyphs. The ones I've noticed are 次将及化等; I checked again and 次及化等 are actually Traditional Chinese glyphs, while 将 is Japanese glyph. It seems that these glyphs are
3. 3.▲
   by ovciokko 6mo ago

   The texts in the images claimed to be Simplified Chinese are not really conforming the standard glyph shapes of hanzi as defined by the government of China; they look more like the Japanese standard shapes of kanji.
4. 4.▲
   by ovciokko 6mo ago

   Thank you for replying! As a non-English speaker too, I always love to see people trying out new things different from the English mindset. Hangul is a very cool writing system and I'd love to see Han live and evolving.
5. 5.▲
   by ovciokko 6mo ago

   This is indeed a cool project! Happy to see experiments on non-English programming languages. I have one question — not trying to be offensive or doubting, just out of curiosity — does Han make use of the unique properties of Hangul (or Kor