out_of_protocol

7 ms·

1.
by out_of_protocol 9d ago
zstd with better compression level would be nice - these numbers are not really comparable since both time and compression level are too different
2.
by out_of_protocol 18d ago
Apple dropped 32 bit support in specific OS version with no way to run it anymore sans downgrading the OS - so it's not hardware restriction
3.
by out_of_protocol 18d ago
Tell that Apple and Android. I have 32 bit native software which can't run on modern devices at all.
4.
by out_of_protocol 22d ago
> early hours of the morning which TZ? > There are no off-peak hours. Probably US west coast hours, but there's no public stats
5.
by out_of_protocol 28d ago
Dunno. Crease almost invisible when screen is on and not pitch black ( using Honor V3 while actual generation is V6).
6.
by out_of_protocol 1mo ago
Does that also mean owner must re-run very model ever released by them to detect anything?
7.
by out_of_protocol 1mo ago
1) That's a lot more entropy to gather, means sample size needs to be huge. 2) this also means check must be run against every user's ID in their database, 10^9 more expensive
8.
by out_of_protocol 1mo ago
Do i understand correctly - to check watermark you need full model weights, of all org models. So running the check is basically the same as running every model once? That's really expensive
9.
by out_of_protocol 2mo ago
Well yes, SV is abbreviation for sievert which measures health risk of radiation
10.
by out_of_protocol 2mo ago
*for a brief moment it actually runs. from the point of the dev - work done on the port will rot very soon, return of investment is really low. Also, the studio may not exist at all by time changes will be necessary - as fast as few days af
11.
by out_of_protocol 2mo ago
Why bother with macos version at all then? Soon current version becomes unusable as well, and needs windows fallback to run since macos version is useless
12.
by out_of_protocol 2mo ago
> It trades something fungible and incredibly cheap (CPU) it could be RAM-bound, which is very much NOT cheap nowadays :)
13.
by out_of_protocol 2mo ago
There's a lot of places without fiber, e.g. all the ships/jets etc. there's a lot of low-density areas, there's islands with no internet or VERY expensive internet
14.
by out_of_protocol 3mo ago
> 6. You can make money without doing evil. You can but well, it's more profitable the other way around....
15.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
On Android, opera browser has text-wrap which fits text into screen on any zooom level. Dunno how people live without this feature
16.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
I blessed to live in a country that uses kilowatts. That works wonderfully (and advertised as such) for AC units
17.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
Did anybody compared these directly using exactly same prompts and harness? I assume V4 Pro could be real frontier model, and if it's true, it'd be better to use it in automation or routine steps instead of simple models (e.g. hai
18.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
1) that's not an ORM 2) after ~8 years of using it, i find it ergonomic, light on congitive load and good for long term support
19.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
Elixir is very ergonomic when it comes to concurrency, e.g. parallel-map example: 1..10 |> Task.async_stream(fn x -> x*2 end, max_concurrency: 2, timeout: 7000, on_timeout: :kill_task) |> Enum.to_list() Equivalent
20.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
Django is not very different than Rails and imo much less ergonomic. Many issues are still there like hidden state/setup needed to call something
21.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
> ActiveRecord is more pleasant to work with than the ORM of Phoenix IMHO, but not everyone shares the same feeling. Well, depends on what you do. Ecto is closely follows SQL logic and allows to translate weird sql queries into code dire
22.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
I'd say Rails is faster than Phoenix (as in development speed) only for the first day or so. After that you'll stumble upon impicit logic, method-missing and this kind of stuff, which will require more time to figure out how it wo
23.
by out_of_protocol 4mo ago
Probably going to be replacement rather than direct recompilement of structs. I imagine all sorts of corner cases are lurking around if you swap implementation around, e.g. if someone force-pushed unknown key into a struct at runtime. Would
24.
by out_of_protocol 5mo ago
i suspect a lot of tools will try to fetch the url without explicit user action (e.g. messengers do that kind of crap). Gotta be hard to keep keys non-revoked, which is a nice side-effect
25.
by out_of_protocol 5mo ago
If you don't use heat pump (which can have 300-500% efficiency), whatever you plug into a wall socket will produce heat at exactly 100%. So the real choice here is either monetize what you are doing with electricity or using a heat pum
26.
by out_of_protocol 5mo ago
1) they do protocol sniffing, and any inconsistency (including statistical) gets you blocked 2) "white list mode" which engaged sometimes (poorly implemented atm), means nothing goes outside of country at all (means 99.9% of every
27.
by out_of_protocol 5mo ago
> How are you suffering equal heat stress from being submerged in moderately warm water by the rules of this universe, you can't survive being submerged in 40C water for a prolonged period of time (even 37C would kill you as well),
28.
by out_of_protocol 5mo ago
Humidity is the key, Finnish style sauna is low humidity+ high temperature (85-115C is OK i think), while Russian banya-style is low temperature (60-80C with high humidity). Both of them produce about the same load on a human
29.
by out_of_protocol 6mo ago
* VP9 where AV1 is not available (default YouTube codec, almost universally hardware-supported). Also universally supported .webm is vp9+opus - which mostly used as modern .gif
30.
by out_of_protocol 6mo ago
VP9 works well too and more supported (default YouTube codec)

More ›