Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ottaborra
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
I think the same could be said of anything resembling technical writing. As an example aside from code writing, I think more than half of the machine learning papers out there are horribly written in the sense they rush a point or give no r
2.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
Emotion management. I think this is more subtle than having a stoic front to everything. There are places/times where showing bare emotions moves the needle forward for example inspiring people, driving home a passionate point and some
3.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
I know I can't really argue with advice but I feel intrinsic motivation is dependent on your upbringing, random factors so I have to say this rubs me the wrong way but is somewhat sound
4.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
I think that is fine advice. I wish it be ground down more as the opposite of what is comfortable encompasses a huge spectra of discomfort.
5.
▲
Ask HN: What is the ultimate secret to growth?
3 points
by
ottaborra
1y ago
|
5 comments
6.
▲
Ask HN: What do you continually observe about the world that others do not?
2 points
by
ottaborra
1y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
When in doubt save money. I have a friend who does the opposite. My friend of misery always regrets it and never learns
8.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
Fair heuristic. AA lot of people report it (gut feeling) doesn't scale as much as they'd like
9.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
I feel this list is missing sitting down to write stuff. It doesn't have to be journaling, it could be writing essays or whatnots
10.
▲
Ask HN: What are your fav/goto decision making hacks/heuristics?
6 points
by
ottaborra
1y ago
|
11 comments
11.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
> Computer scientists might argue that all programming languages are Turing complete anyway and the choice of which one to use is not that important Efficiency and the real world will eat them(comp scientists who think like this) up for
12.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
Linguistic relativity seems to be a thing. Because of the differences I would think it could be inferred that an ordering amongst languages exists. In the least a partial ordering exists, so maybe some "specific" languages that ar
13.
▲
Negative Results for Sparse AutoEncoders on Downstream Tasks
(lesswrong.com)
2 points
by
ottaborra
1y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
Negative Results for SAEs On Downstream Tasks and Deprioritising SAE Research
(lesswrong.com)
1 points
by
ottaborra
1y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
ottaborra
1y ago
Agentic frameworks are nothing but somewhat impressive glue engineering and hundred percent will be passed over when models with bigger context lengths and better reasoning come about Rule of thumb: if business folks drop a AI term that bec
16.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
Something I've learnt the hard way. While there is merit to be able to do things without model assistance, this is a tale as old as time: purists who resist model usage will in the end be the unintentional enforcers of a culture of: ev
17.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
RNN with extra steps?
18.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
I don't understand. If kaggle solutions were able to do those, what the hell do these mean? https://arcprize.org/2024-results
19.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
Given how o3 cracked the arc bench and I'm probably sounding like a broken record, this isn't as farfetched as some of you may think it is. ML models will very likely continue to scale regardless of how many bets are placed agains
20.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
> you're saying you can't understand why you should be happy to be here? I think you miss the aspect of how insignificant existence is locally. Sure the odds are astronomical but you weren't there to experience that measu
21.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
Building the future
22.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
Is it not true that The Arc test is designed to be one where the rules are dynamic? i.e every one of the tests are different from each other in an absolute sense. Learning about one tells you nothing of substance about the other unless of c
23.
▲
Ask HN: What does OpenAI's O3 Arc result mean for the field?
12 points
by
ottaborra
2y ago
|
6 comments
24.
▲
Ask HN: What does OpenAI's O3 Arc result mean for the field?
2 points
by
ottaborra
2y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
Something to chew on for me. But what is a manifold then if not a topological space that is locally the same as R^(some dimension) ?
26.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
tangent: any reason to assume it gets mapped to a manifold rather than something that is not?
27.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
"How much do you earn right now?" With all due respect, that is none of your damn business "Interesting. I have no more questions"
28.
▲
Ask HN: What did our AI efforts of the past get wrong about AI models?
3 points
by
ottaborra
2y ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
Ask HN: What bad problem solving habits have you seen from afar or experienced?
1 points
by
ottaborra
2y ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
by
ottaborra
2y ago
I think there needs to be some feedback that the goal is sustainable, one tooth a day to an adhd mind is just as bad as not doing anything as it's still a very tall staircase to climb. Too granular a step
More ›