orly01

7 ms·

1.
by orly01 2mo ago
I've heard you are not forced to connect to wifi, and on most of them you can connect make it default certain HDMI input. Latency to turn on/off might be less good than the 2010 one, but other than that this might be a very good w
2.
by orly01 2mo ago
It doesn't look like the second has been cut off to get the first, because the font is different. It looks like the second was an attempt to extend the first (also, it kills the joke)
3.
by orly01 5mo ago
Nice experiment. Some feedback: I could not catch that the circle meant the sun. I did catch seconds, minutes, day, month, and I deduced TK meant Tokyo and SF meant San Francisco and could not deduce the city ZG represents. So, I don'
4.
by orly01 9mo ago
YDRC
5.
by orly01 10mo ago
My whole point is that it maybe possible to do perception using a lot of computational power, or alternatively, there could be another kind of smart ideas that allows to do it in a diferent way with much less computation. It is not clear it
6.
by orly01 10mo ago
Why should it have to be expensive computationally? How do brains do it with such a low amount of energy? I think catching the brain abilities even of a bug might be very hard, but that does not mean that there isn't a way to do it wit
7.
by orly01 10mo ago
Wow. Sounds pretty impressive.
8.
by orly01 10mo ago
What does it mean that each model is allowed 2000 tokens to generate its clock?
9.
by orly01 11mo ago
I don't know much about this, but I understand Project Jupyter is Nonprofit. If I go to "jupyter.org" I see a tab "Community" and another "Governance". If I go to "deepnote.com" I see "Custo
10.
by orly01 11mo ago
I didn't expect it to be about literally seeing.
11.
by orly01 1y ago
Yes, monkeys could write Shakespeare works given enough time. But in this case, it is really hard to know if a model is identifying "correct answers" reliably. A lot of answers are really hard to qualify as correct or not when wri
12.
by orly01 1y ago
I agree with most of what you said. However it is not correct to say they are executing algorithms, just as it is not correct to say that a water fountain is executing an algorithm.
13.
by orly01 1y ago
I agree that the metaphor is good. The point is understood. However, the specific clothes that are considered OK in one context ore another are always changing and based in criteria that most of the time makes no sense.
14.
by orly01 3y ago
Yep, that's why I said either that, or they are incompetent. Not caring at all about false positives, which by the way are very common, enters the category of incompetence for me.
15.
by orly01 3y ago
But the moderator AI does not need to understand the meme. Ideally, it should only care about texts violating the law. I don't think you need to improve that much current LLM so they can detect actual harm threats or hate speech from a
16.
by orly01 3y ago
I agree with you, no way a human reviewed it. But this implies that people at facebook believe so much in their AI that there is no way at all to appeal what it does to a human eventually. Not even for doing learning reinforcement they have
17.
by orly01 3y ago
p2p?
18.
by orly01 3y ago
For now, all we know is this technology replaces the human capacity of drawing with good technique what a human wanted to be drawn. I think the relevant part of art is not the ability of generating an image, but to put thought on what you w
19.
by orly01 3y ago
If unreal decides to abandon all older versions support and development, to just focus on something new that requires payment, I don't think you can keep fixing or updating the old unsupported code, even if you have the source