onlydeadheroes

9 ms·

1.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
That is a funny question (in the good sense). I would argue the VCs are cargo culting themselves, but of course another could argue that once the VC money has moved into the pockets of the programmers, then the important part of the process
2.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
It will be easier to see who were the useful idiots when the usefulness runs out.
3.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
How did it get dead?
4.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
There is funny business going on at manjaro, but by god do they deliver! I run 5 linux computers at home for various ends and I got tired of putting a new Ubuntu on them every now and then. At the time I looked at manjaro, other rolling dis
5.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
pure noise? because you are always right, of course.
6.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
Funny how much a single question can be feared.
7.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
What was the state of r/The_Donald at the time?
8.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
Good job making all these accounts to congratulate yourself!
9.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
Even today the english wikipedia has articles that are full of lies, like for example the Gamergate article.
10.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
test
11.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
jQuery, when people stop fucking around and start making sites that work again.
12.
by onlydeadheroes 6y ago
And that is not the only place knowledge gets locked behind: https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/chinas-devas...
13.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
So shooting the messenger is now a defensible position in polite company?
14.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
He is saying dynamic languages crash and burn in this context. Specifying "dynamic" does strongly suggest non-dynamic languages do not crash and burn in this context.
15.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Of course, because security issues and language pitfalls have no bearing on cryptographic implementations.
16.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Indeed it is much better to implement it in a language such as C or C++ that has historically had almost no security issues and has very few pitfalls.
17.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
That does not matter, nothing is above criticism.
18.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Teenager with Asperger’s placed under house arrest, fined over £500 for asking police officer’s gender https://caldronpool.com/teenager-with-aspergers-placed-under...
19.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
We have our skills, and the ability to implement anything that we can imagine (with the necessary detail). They can't take that away.
20.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
People like that have no place in software or any form of engineering.
21.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
I consider Tor to be completely compromised. Consider this: 1) Political entryism by ideologues. These people stand against merit, and these are the same people who every few weeks post a lead-balloon of a thread against it in this very for
22.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
The problem is that the "something" that is "wrong" is wrongthing.
23.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
X has been going away for longer that the careers of most people on this site.
24.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
I guess we can soon expect them to relicense it all to free the world from the viral nature of the GPL.
25.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Quick reminder that advisory locks may need to be released by the same connection that acquired them...
26.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
> Not sure whether it can be argued if it is really a better alternative. I suppose that when you watch your children die from climate change, then you will know.
27.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Did you ever study Latin?
28.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Not all moderation is Orwellian but there is moderation happening right now that is Orwellian.
29.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Thank you but I will comment as I see fit.
30.
by onlydeadheroes 7y ago
Yes, the humans.

More ›