olegk

6 ms·

1.
by olegk 16y ago
SPAM. Guys, cmon, this is obvious book spam. There's even an affiliate link at the bottom
2.
by olegk 16y ago
I know a del.icio.us employee (one of the first 10) who got completely ripped off on his equity.
3.
by olegk 16y ago
You have no idea how spam works. A bot isn't just one user trying to enter "cat" repeatedly. Botnets send requests from thousands of different IPs. You wouldn't know which ones are real users, and which ones are bots.
4.
by olegk 16y ago
My spam script would always answer "cat", so among 8 options (cat, dog, house, drum, road, tree, book, horse), I'd get a 12.5% success rate. Plus you constantly have to update your image library, which a huge pain. Also, recognizing 10,000
5.
by olegk 16y ago
Nobody is being taxed on the cash one has in his bank account. You're taxed on the income your cash generates. So cut the crap.
6.
by olegk 16y ago
So you think it's great that rich get taxed at 15% and the poor/middle class at roughly 30-40%? I'm pretty sure among you and Krugman, you're a hack.
7.
by olegk 16y ago
Still doesn't make sense. If you display 10 random animals (or shapes), and ask a user to pick the right one, a dumb spam script would have a 10% success rate. If you display one image of an animal and give 10 possible answers, a dumb spam
8.
by olegk 16y ago
You have no idea what you're talking about. > show a picture of an animal or a shape and ask what it is, Ok, so let's say you come up with pictures of 20 different animals. A spam script that picks the same answer every time will have a
9.
by olegk 16y ago
C300 is definitely NOT the fastest SSD drive. There are a few that are much much faster. 1) FusionIO ioXtreme = 670/280 MB/s 2) FusionIO ioDrive = 770/750 MB/s, 140,000 IOPS 3) FusionIO ioDrive Duo = 1500/1500 MB/s, 261,000 IOPS 4) RamSan-4
10.
by olegk 16y ago
Needs interview transcripts.
11.
by olegk 16y ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbk980jV7Ao
12.
by olegk 16y ago
This is stupid. Of course video percentage will grow. Every time you double the resolution, you quadruple the amount of data you have to transfer.
13.
by olegk 16y ago
It was sold for $12.5 billion (in stock) to Terra Networks (Telefonica) in May 2000 (Telefonica stock is worth more now than it used to in 2000) So it looks like Lycos investors made a brilliant move.
14.
by olegk 16y ago
NO
15.
by olegk 16y ago
That's horrible. Instead of drawing graphs on the client side, you're pushing insanely large number of images to the browser. It makes sense for google maps, not for graphs. Plus you can't do any animation, changes to the graphs on the fly.
16.
by olegk 16y ago
Does it work at 1000 MPH? Plus they are talking about voice data, not just the coordinates.
17.
by olegk 16y ago
Except that most people don't have internet access. Only like 25% of the world population. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
18.
by olegk 16y ago
Notice how that the chart scale doesn't start with zero. In reality they win maybe 10-15% in speed, but they have all the crap overhead to support and manage.
19.
by olegk 16y ago
As much as I like what he's doing, he's so fucked.
20.
Opera has the fastest JS engine now (Sunspider test)
2 points by olegk 16y ago|2 comments
21.
by olegk 16y ago
Chrome is not the fastest. Sunspider benchmark (Win XP, dual core machine): Opera (v10.53): 299.8ms +/- 1.0% Safari (v5): 314.2ms +/- 1.7% Chrome (v5.0.375.55): 326.6ms +/- 7.9% Firefox (v3.6.3): 716.4ms +/- 1.7%
22.
by olegk 16y ago
http://www.google.com/search?q=(5+MBps)*(2+hours) http://www.bing.com/search?q=(5+MBps)*(2+hours) And that's why I use google
23.
by olegk 16y ago
EPIC FAOL
24.
by olegk 16y ago
Once burglars figure out what it is, they will use it to their advantage.
25.
by olegk 16y ago
Your PNG compressor is garbage. PNG, 339 bytes: http://i.imgur.com/68vR8.png Also don't forget that the path string will be gzipped (to around 220 bytes).
26.
by olegk 16y ago
Your profit margins must be insane if you can afford to give 6% of your earnings away for some glorified credit card processing.
27.
by olegk 16y ago
Sunspider benchmark (Win XP, dual core machine): Opera (v10.53): 299.8ms +/- 1.0% Safari (v5): 314.2ms +/- 1.7% Chrome (v5.0.375.55): 326.6ms +/- 7.9% Firefox (v3.6.3): 716.4ms +/- 1.7%
28.
by olegk 16y ago
| 5.9% plus $.95 per transaction or a flat rate of 8.9% Wow, that's very expensive. I'd prefer PayPal or Google Checkout.
29.
by olegk 16y ago
You seriously think the rest of the country is different?
30.
by olegk 16y ago
Zoom all the way in. The quality is so bad, you can downsample it by the factor of 2 (or maybe even 4) without any detail loss, (which reduces the number of pixels by the factor of 4, or 16 respectively). So it's really a 3-10 gigapixel pan

More ›