oleczek

11 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   Fair point - I overstated it. Thanks for the correction.
2. 2.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   Thanks for vouching. Appreciate the heads-up.
3. 3.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   Yeah, original is clearer. Just went with the shorter one so more people would actually click.
4. 4.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   yeah English isn't my first language so i used AI to clean up the writing. the research, the data and the analysis are all mine and all open (in the linked repo)
5. 5.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   Yeah, the optimism/hedging part lines up nicely with that framing. The bit that still puzzles me is that the same edit moved expressed confidence in opposite directions — down for Gemma, up for Qwen. If it were simply removing one shar
6. 6.▲
   by oleczek 2mo ago

   Author here. Quick version: “abliteration” (basically removing the direction in the model that causes it to refuse) is the go-to method people use to make open models uncensored. Most people treat it like a clean surgical cut - it just kill
7. 7.▲
   "Uncensored" open LLMs are measurably more optimistic than their base models(arxiv.org)

   43 points by oleczek 2mo ago|22 comments