okamiueru

4 ms·

1.
by okamiueru 4d ago
All of the things you mention here are fairly obvious. But that doesn't make any of the reporting misleading. The parts that record audio, transcribes audio, scans networks for devices, and perhaps more importantly persists all of thes
2.
by okamiueru 4d ago
Did we watch a different video? The point of hacking the TV, and making it do bad thing. Was to explain the privacy issues inherent with the hardware capabilites for video and audio recording, which combined with multiple known exploits to
3.
by okamiueru 16d ago
If it matters, it seemed pretty clear to me. You're also explicit about it, so I'm not sure how one would think you were referring to mouse input. Unless people type by clicking on a virtual keyboard? Benefit of the doubt can only
4.
by okamiueru 17d ago
Can you give some specific examples? In my experience (which I also verified to make sure), all of the things you mention act on keydown. The exceptions are on multi-key combinations, which follow a special key that is held down while modif
5.
by okamiueru 19d ago
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
6.
by okamiueru 22d ago
> there could be a screenshot. but even still, even with a screenshot, this could be a device that was rooted back when it was rootable and just picked up from the shelf. the motivation is obvious I wasn't particularly concerned abo
7.
by okamiueru 23d ago
I find the vocabulary used to be disturbingly fascinating, to the degree concepts are being anthropomorphized. It's so pervasive that I cannot help but assume it is entirely deliberate. The principles by which LLMs functions haven&#x27
8.
by okamiueru 24d ago
Supposedly this: - https://github.com/ericpardee/fire-hd-ownership/blob/main/po... - https://github.com/ericpardee/fire-hd-ownership/blob/main/gr... Occams Razor stil
9.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
> Again, you are the one who arrogantly say they llms can not be intelligent without supplying any argument for such. Not really. You've provided the arguments yourself, just now. But, you don't understand them. Which, brings m
10.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
The thing about discussing or explaining constraints, is that it rarely is useful or productive if the other side does not accept (or understand) the reality of them. Turing completeness is not exactly a high bar, and it's genuinely co
11.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
First of all, the argument isn't that LLMs (with I assume some automation) cannot be used in searching a problem space. I'm assuming this is what you're referring to, in terms of contributions? That's the part where LLMs
12.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
> The age of humans comprehending things is coming to an end: our brains just won't have the capacity to make meaningful contributions to science, math, or technology. That sentiment makes me cringe. If you understand how LLMs work,
13.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
It's more that you are being too obtuse to be worth the engagement. You see it as running away from a challenge. I see it as leaving an area because it's become unpleasant. I already told you that you're here for an argument
14.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
If you ask the dice "what's 2 + 2?" do consider it meaningful to say "the dice told the truth" if you happen to roll a 4?
15.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
If it is of any consolation. You are spot on, and saved me the effort (which had run out). I'd recommend to leave it alone as well, as it isn't worth it to try and explain logical fallacies. Or, heck, you do you. I'm just too
16.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
Edit: removed. Wasn't worth it.
17.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
Debating requires that one engages with the premise. Making up a different one, and then share your thoughts on it, is something different.
18.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
Cool. Aside from all that. Roads are neat, right? PS: It is pretty darn cozy in the cradle.
19.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
HN sure has a different type of crowd compared to ten years ago. Out of curiosity, what brings you here? Also, what is your favorite AI model?
20.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
Not sure to what extend, if at all, I should engage here, as you do have some strong preconceptions that probably makes it less likely productive. > Steal from everyone (taxation) [...] give the money to government-run Facebook, and ever
21.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
Nah. We should normalize public services and resources to develop knowledge and tools, that are made freely available. Provide incentive programs and reward those that take on such initiatives. There are many such services where I'm fr
22.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
You could take that even further, to the actual danger of reliance of these tools when you lack the expert knowledge. That is, when you assume it took you 100%, but missed the 15% it got very wrong, or perhaps even worse: subtly wrong . Th
23.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
That seems awfully self deprecating. Surely, you expect better of yourself in at least some area, than the average competency of humans across all areas?
24.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
I'm not sure if you are aware as to the extent certain processes and functions are being anthropomorphized. These systems are not "intelligent" if you follow the dictionary definition. Hence the question posed to get a better
25.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
They do start out by self identify as a "vibe coder". Which is equally embarrassing. What follows is an enumerated list, which I assume they didn't write the contents of, and I don't care to figure out. I had a hiatus fr
26.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
I'd have to ask for you to be more specific, otherwise, to take your answer at face value, it comes across as a contradiction. > [Opus 5's output] is beyond the comprehension of virtually all engineers and developers That would
27.
by okamiueru 1mo ago
How do you define intelligence? I encounter that kind of sentiment all too often, and I have to assume we go by wildly different understanding of what that might entail.
28.
by okamiueru 2mo ago
I did not mean to offend, and only made the assumption for the stated reason. Apologies!
29.
by okamiueru 2mo ago
I'm going to assume you are a product manager, or someone who does not do the actual software development. The place where you draw the line of abstraction, is what I'm basing that assumption on. The reason why a PO can explain so
30.
by okamiueru 2mo ago
I am not sure if the absurdity of that statement is intentional, or a result of just how far the Overton window has drifted. First of all, private companies shouldn't be given that responsibility to begin with. Meta in particular, ha

More ›