ohans

6 ms·

1.
Show HN: What if you could review code without reading code?(github.com)
4 points by ohans 11h ago|0 comments
2.
by ohans 22d ago
Lib author here. Like most teams, we ship fast, and increasingly the important thing for us is making sure the overall system is healthy. Working code isn't enough. So, before reading the code diff on PRs, we can judge from visually ri
3.
by ohans 22d ago
Broken X link on the site footer FYI
4.
by ohans 22d ago
Love the name! Now back to reading the docs to get a better sense of how this works :)
5.
by ohans 24d ago
Author here. The consensus, in order of how much they write about it mostly: architecture and repo layout, how to test, build commands, dos-and-don'ts, PR etiquette, and code style. The surprise was tone, and the lack of non-technical
6.
What the 100 biggest GitHub repos put in their AGENTS.md files(coldtea.ai)
4 points by ohans 24d ago|1 comments
7.
by ohans 24d ago
Hilarious on not trying to be different, and congrats on the launch. I've seen too many of these it has lost its charm for me, sadly
8.
by ohans 29d ago
What I've found to work is just to bring the review cycle locally, e.g., implement with Claude and review with Codex (with my guardrails set) in the terminal. Something like Herdr works well; I use Coldtea That being said, the reason I
9.
by ohans 1mo ago
Being a smaller team, our process is a lot simpler, but the "ephemeral test env" is the one bit that's helped us move faster and more confidently Since it allows us to automate regression testing with visual QA agents that te
10.
by ohans 8mo ago
Author here. AI agents have dominated Twitter/X the past few days: Claude Code, Remotion, Cursor, etc. But most developers are running these locally. Terminal agents on your machine. That's useful, but it's a different game w
11.
Add Skills to Your Vercel AI SDK Agent Without Building Infra(bluebag.ai)
1 points by ohans 8mo ago|1 comments
12.
by ohans 9mo ago
TIL: you could add a ".diff" to a PR URL. Thanks! As for PR reviews, assuming you've got linting and static analysis out the way, you'd need to enter a sufficiently reasonable prompt to truly catch problems or surface re
13.
by ohans 9mo ago
This was a brilliant write up, and loved the interactivity. I do think "logs are broken" is a bit overstated. The real problem is unstructured events + weak conventions + poor correlation. Brilliant write up regardless
14.
by ohans 9mo ago
Hey HN, can't help but think this is where AI development will be heading in 2026, with the biggest reasons being deterministic outputs + the cost savings that come from progressive disclosure as opposed to tools/MCPs As always, c
15.
Why OpenAI’s Move to Skills Matters If You’re Shipping AI Agents(medium.com)
4 points by ohans 9mo ago|1 comments
16.
by ohans 9mo ago
Yes!! The runtimes are ephemeral VMs/containers with no network access (exposed) On OS, the core of the solution is not currently open source; it’s still changing a lot, and I don’t want to publish an API or SDK surface that I’ll immed
17.
by ohans 9mo ago
Hi HN, When Anthropic published their Skills system ( https://www.anthropic.com/news/skills ), the idea clicked for me immediately: take a general-purpose agent and turn it into a specialized one with procedural knowledg
18.
Show HN: Anthropic-style Skills for any LLM(github.com)
3 points by ohans 9mo ago|3 comments
19.
by ohans 9mo ago
OK, got it! Cool. I had wild ideas, but this makes sense. QQ: on clicking the articles, I expected to get redirected to the original article, but I stayed on your site. Is what I see a summarisation of the original article? Are the original
20.
by ohans 9mo ago
What does "runs itself" mean in this context?
21.
by ohans 9mo ago
No qualms! Thanks for sharing :)
22.
by ohans 10mo ago
Really cool! I reckon a nice UI would be a good addition
23.
by ohans 10mo ago
Looks good! You could push to npm so that running it could be as easy as: npx webclone URL (no repo cloning required) Also, FYI, when running the example code node webclone.js https://www.example.com/ It fails (at least for
24.
by ohans 2y ago
For just $10? The pricing begins at $45. Except you mean when broken down monthly? Congrats on the launch!
25.
by ohans 2y ago
I see, thanks. New to HN. I suppose I'll repost it later next week since I can't delete/edit the existing post. Thanks!
26.
by ohans 2y ago
dammit, just updated the link. Thanks!
27.
Show HN: No-subscription email platform for occasional senders
4 points by ohans 2y ago|5 comments
28.
by ohans 2y ago
You make some solid points! > I don't know what you mean by "true alternative to Amazon SES. e.g., the GMail API is restrictive ( https://support.google.com/a/answer/166852?hl=en ) for bulk sends. That&
29.
by ohans 2y ago
That's certainly a possibility! However, with 300 billion emails sent a day and assuming 10% of those are transactional / marketing, I assume there's a play for a pay-as-you-go solution. SES holds a monopoly in that space now
30.
Ask HN: Why Don't Google and Microsoft Offer an Alternative to Amazon SES?
4 points by ohans 2y ago|5 comments

More ›