ohNoe5

6 ms·

1.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
We will never fundamentally get rid of thinking; it's coupled to navigation of 3D reality we live And we don't need words to think; cognitive problem solving and language processing are separate processes [1] We will shift the pro
2.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Thems the breaks when all the politicians trend towards 60+ and went their entire lives believing the giant foot will smash us if we raise taxes GenX was the first generation raised on "science" first education And the transition
3.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Oops I meant "without intentional conservatism" And "Progress or..." not "is or"
4.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Kubernetes is software. It cannot do anything "itself" let alone "replace itself". Don't anthropomorphize software Inevitably it will be a human replacing it with what they define is the best method
5.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Hardware is important to operation of computers and software as we know them A bunch of config management DSL startups, and web scale data storage solutions, not so much
6.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Ephemeral user accounts were agreed upon before that. The OG container Docker and k8s are just wrappers around namespaces, cgroups, file system ACLs, some essential cli commands, which can also be configured per user. We may be headed back
7.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Yeah it's that lack of perfect recall, imo, that gives rise to intelligence and progress. If we humans just did exactly what we did yesterday, what progress? It's baked into the immutable constants of the universe for us; entropy,
8.
by ohNoe5 5mo ago
Oh no, a couple thousand people, largely engaged in little more than modern conservatism, might leave the rest of us 300+ million alone for a change rather than demand fealty to their personal story and personal autonomy (fealty to which ac