odo1242

19 ms·

1.
by odo1242 5d ago
Well, that’s basically just the California law everyone hated
2.
by odo1242 6d ago
Ah
3.
by odo1242 6d ago
> A headwind makes it harder to advance in the direction you're going nit: except in aviation
4.
by odo1242 9d ago
It seems like the main disadvantage would be that you have to load all the autocomplete data / model weights on the client-side and your webpage might be CPU/memory limited
5.
by odo1242 10d ago
The client is doing the work in both cases
6.
by odo1242 10d ago
Well, there was CoinHive which did this exact thing 6-7 years ago, but that system got abused a bit much
7.
by odo1242 10d ago
AIs achieving legal personhood isn’t going to do much. You can’t just put an AI behind bars
8.
by odo1242 11d ago
Government funding must be approved by Congress. If Congress already approved funding the NSF, then it has to be Congress that removes the funding.
9.
by odo1242 11d ago
Second order code loss: make a change, realize you screwed everything up, unable to revert
10.
by odo1242 11d ago
Fair, but like, why??
11.
by odo1242 11d ago
I mean, versioning is basically free from a technical / storage / time spent standpoint, and my experience says that if you don’t do it you likely will lose your code at some point
12.
by odo1242 12d ago
On the contrary, it lets you MITM encrypted communications by swapping the website's original certificate for the "well trusted TLS cert"
13.
by odo1242 12d ago
ml5.js has a similar license: https://github.com/ml5js/ml5-library?tab=License-1-ov-file Their license is basically "use freely unless our community decides you violated the code of conduct, for three years"
14.
by odo1242 13d ago
I'm just going to borrow a sibling comment: > afiori: JavaScript's execution model uses cooperative concurrency to avoid a tons of data races, preemptive non-parallel concurrency would make all web development incredibly harder
15.
by odo1242 13d ago
No, I'm just saying that cooperative multitasking is there for good reason and isn't necessarily a bad idea.
16.
by odo1242 13d ago
Update: this is because ChatGPT was cheating and reading my conversation history. The closest I can get on a standard LLM is golffizbuz (10 characters)
17.
by odo1242 13d ago
My attempt: > Prompt: mkfzbuzgolf > LLM Used: Default ChatGPT free LLM > Output: for i in range(1,101):print("Fizz"*(i%3<1)+"Buzz"*(i%5<1)or i) So, 11 prompt characters and 62 output. ——- Did a few more tr
18.
by odo1242 13d ago
Cooperative multitasking isn’t universally a bad idea (in fact, Rust supports it)
19.
by odo1242 13d ago
It’s the same company that bought MuseScore, they basically plan on monetizing it through plugins, audio samples, or optional cloud services (like MuseScore)
20.
by odo1242 14d ago
Unironically, this is a browser extension I wanna make lol
21.
by odo1242 14d ago
Nice, I see how that affects the cost benefit analysis for sure
22.
by odo1242 14d ago
So, basically, sure, but I disagree with the hypothetical in the first place
23.
by odo1242 14d ago
I mean it could also get dropped yea, sure. This is just a neutral discussion of the costs, I'm not making an argument for anything. (As for data, the third hard disk isn't actually bought yet and is meant to represent an offsite
24.
by odo1242 14d ago
I'd argue the things that make a codebase more human-readable is also what makes it more agent-readable though. Agents are trained on human data, after all. The position in the article is reasonable because what would end up happening
25.
by odo1242 14d ago
The article itself seems to have the right title: Async Rust vs RTOS showdown! The title on HN should probably be updated to that
26.
by odo1242 14d ago
(The other benefit of having a homelab is, of course, you can run services that aren’t limited to cloud offerings and run processing on the data locally)
27.
by odo1242 14d ago
In my case: I did the math and it would take me ~4-5 years to recoup the initial investment (of about $450) in my homelab (comparing my server + 3 copies of 2TB with the cost of a 2TB google drive subscription). (Also excludes the time spen
28.
by odo1242 14d ago
They don’t do this for the same reason GitHub isn’t getting rid of free repositories- it would create an opening for someone else
29.
by odo1242 16d ago
> The target audience didn't evaluate that as a limitation - the majority of the market for Apple devices does trust that they will not produce and sell a computer incapable of support their use. Well, kinda the point. We know this
30.
by odo1242 16d ago
I can definitely say the performance is good now, though

More ›