ochronus

7 ms·

1.
by ochronus 14d ago
Immich is wonderful, but if you're mostly looking for a solution to take your mind off the problem and don't want to self-host, try Ente photos.
2.
by ochronus 1mo ago
Ugh, I see "future" and "meta" in the same sentence, hard nope
3.
by ochronus 1mo ago
The author is conflating coding with other parts of the sw engineer role.
4.
by ochronus 1mo ago
Yup, if you know what to point it at - where does _that_ skill come from? Experience.
5.
by ochronus 1mo ago
Wherever I worked (and as long as it was up to me), the mindset and expectation was that a junior we hire will need to become a medior in max 2 years. Of course, we provided the right investment (environment, mentorship, coaching, learning
6.
by ochronus 1mo ago
If you do your hiring (and then mentorship) right, even such juniors can skyrocket in 1-2 years. AI won't do that. So, in case of willing juniors, you get much, much more "out of them" soon, if you invest a little. They will
7.
by ochronus 2mo ago
Huh? How so? Please add some sources
8.
by ochronus 2mo ago
Nope, it's the lawyer firms that come after you. Google removes reviews on request for its own comfort, but if you provide proof, they put it back. Then the lawyers come.
9.
by ochronus 3mo ago
This is lovely
10.
by ochronus 3mo ago
No, no, much better: make it a SKILL.md ;)
11.
by ochronus 4mo ago
I think Liquid Glass is a general UX/Product blunder, not a deliberate evil masterplan to force users to buy new phones.
12.
by ochronus 4mo ago
Doesn't match my personal experience over a handful of iPhone generations. I know, anecdotal only, but still.
13.
by ochronus 4mo ago
I see your point, but I'd be surprised if they'd lose a significant user base in the end; the hype is just way too high
14.
by ochronus 4mo ago
I don't think they are clueless, but rather, struggling. Being an AI provider is a money burner, and they probably don't have enough fuel for the fire anymore, so they are trying things to squeeze more $$$ and limit usage at the s
15.
by ochronus 4mo ago
Yes, it's related to the limits of the subscription plans. 2ish months ago the same sub started hitting limits earlier and earlier on very similar tasks/codebases. Then they said, Oh, sorry, it was a caching bug, now it's fix
16.
by ochronus 4mo ago
Yeah, claude code is mostly unusable at this point. It's been in a constant decline for a good 1-2 months. It's more like a scam now.
17.
by ochronus 5mo ago
Hence the only other path: slow, constant enshittification of the models' performance
18.
by ochronus 5mo ago
As predicted by many. The math is, as usual, mathing.
19.
by ochronus 5mo ago
No, it's not, except for a small percentage of the userbase.
20.
by ochronus 5mo ago
Haha, right, just like the recent uncommunicated changes to limits, cache, etc.
21.
by ochronus 5mo ago
This is awesome! Thank you for building it!
22.
by ochronus 6mo ago
Hmm, the bug I hit lasted for days and burned through my credits/limits/tokens like crazy, consistently. It's gone after the last update.
23.
by ochronus 6mo ago
No, I think they mean: - https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7mkn3/psa_claud... - https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7zgj0/comment/o...
24.
by ochronus 6mo ago
Ok, so this is how they try to compensate for their messed up month of bugs (insane token burn)
25.
by ochronus 6mo ago
Really cool :)
26.
by ochronus 7mo ago
Of course, this is still considering the current model of working. Which in itself is a question.
27.
by ochronus 7mo ago
This discussion feels analogous to me to the age-old "we can do it fast now, and do it right later" tradeoff discussion, except now it's about knowledge, maintainability etc.. There are stages of companies and types of produc
28.
by ochronus 7mo ago
The creator of the hammer says driving nails into wood planks is a solved problem. Carpenters are now obsolete.
29.
by ochronus 7mo ago
GSD does that, too.
30.
by ochronus 7mo ago
Great idea, and some of the tools are already somewhat covering it, e.g. GSD or spec-kit. https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done https://github.com/github/spec-kit

More ›