obsoletehippo

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   Well, he describes some folks' work as "crackpot-level bullshit" and repeatedly states that other authors "have no idea what they're talking about". These seem to me to be personal critiques. Generally, I&#x27
2. 2.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   A real model of rigorous analytical thinking here: there are cases of fraud in academia, therefore all of academia is entirely fraudulent and should be dispensed with. Or it should take lessons from... the financial sector?! Yes, there shou
3. 3.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   You could use comments and track changes? It's really only techies who feel the need to turn writing text into a laborious version control problem.
4. 4.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   I like how the Social Impact paragraph notes reduced labor costs, yay! Not e.g., reduced need for artists, so you're all out of a job.
5. 5.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   http://alexey.stomakhin.com/research/mpm.html
6. 6.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   Want to give any evidence of your Boogeyman Trudeau's efforts to punish the middle class?
7. 7.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   Your solution to people messing up a McDonald's is to have them murdered by the government? Did I get that right?
8. 8.▲
   by obsoletehippo 2y ago

   I invite you to share your evidence that all private enterprises are strictly superior to any state owned enterprises, as that is clearly the stronger (and less likely to be valid) position.
9. 9.▲
   by obsoletehippo 3y ago

   So your faith in the competence of government oversight is what primarily prevents you from believing this piece of research is correct? That's an unusual stance for HN. :-) Both the companies and the government obviously have a financ
10. 10.▲
    by obsoletehippo 3y ago

    Take it easy; dude is just sharing his own personal opinions on life. YMMV. No need to get all exercised about it.