Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
obastemur
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
obastemur
11y ago
It's not part of the website. It's an unlinked html page that is reachable thanks to google. I'm wondering, for how long Mark is going to benefit that page to keep saying "cracked" JXcore again?
2.
▲
by
obastemur
11y ago
did not even realize we have this page till today... I'm going to keep that page for Mark E. Hasse [edit] and put a notice that there is no such a thing like protection. BTW; What is dishonest? Claiming to cracking something open or le
3.
▲
by
obastemur
11y ago
is there any link from any of the jxcore pages to that year old page ? It even says that download Beta 2... What beta 2 is that? https://github.com/jxcore/jxcore is the place (as you and he already knows) we publicly g
4.
▲
by
obastemur
11y ago
This is so dumb cheap Mark! This is an open source project and everything is open in the wild while we stated several times there is no source code protection on our Github page. Second time you are doing this the same cheap way. Congrats!
5.
▲
JavaScript, first class IOT citizen
(oguzbastemur.blogspot.com)
2 points
by
obastemur
11y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Node.js truly on Android and iOS
(oguzbastemur.blogspot.com)
12 points
by
obastemur
12y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
Apache Cordova Node.js plugin
(github.com)
9 points
by
obastemur
12y ago
|
0 comments
8.
▲
Asm.js for Node.js
(oguzbastemur.blogspot.com)
3 points
by
obastemur
12y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
I should keep myself from buying all these stuff from day-one prices..
10.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
Yet this is just a declaration for now, we do not have any intention to keep it closed source. There is no need to trade stability with speed since most of the 'current' performance difference with JXcore comes from less amount of
11.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
Please read the last paragraph ( we are committed to 'entirely' open source it, right after the engine switch )
12.
▲
How Node.js applications will benefit from replacing V8 in JXcore
(oguzbastemur.blogspot.com)
29 points
by
obastemur
12y ago
|
21 comments
13.
▲
Media streaming module for Node.js and JXcore
(github.com)
3 points
by
obastemur
12y ago
|
1 comments
14.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
Wondering something a little bit close to strong AI and how it could be .. "The robots already have some autonomy and can make decisions about taking steps and moving their joints, McKenna said. However, a human will still supervisor t
15.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
last 5 mins I'm trying to reach this link. the website is not reachable any more. How many people are trying to do the same ?
16.
▲
by
obastemur
12y ago
Sure but if you have the environment prepared for that... Hey! this is already compiled, tested etc with lots of additions and ready for hacking!
17.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
At what part I said that Its all done over a weekend? from the post "..Last weekend I could finish the prototype and measure the initial performance of the solution.." If you still understand that it's all finished over a wee
18.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
I would like to remind some things here; > Maybe you don't have a case but there are many scenarios can benefit from multithreading including web hosting. > The goal is to have a zero compatibility issue and we are almost there w
19.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
It doesn't change anything for javascript modules. On the other hand, we already embedded most popular c,c++ modules internally (with multithreading in mind) (coming with next beta) Besides, making a native c,c++ module multithread co
20.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
Thanks for the comments. >JXCore allows you to run x number of tasks in parallel where x is the number of CPUs? You may have a 8 cores but configure JXcore to use 64 threads. > The problem is solved by running multiple node processes
21.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
it's not a commercial fork. "For now" it's closed source.
22.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
The initial name was nodejx but we changed it to jxcore. (not nubis.com / it's nubisa.com)
23.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
"most people don't realize is that it makes a better MongoDB than MongoDB " (IMHO) Unfortunately for most of the people, old habits to be made. Indeed a nice project and great release.
24.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
Considering the fact that nothing yet optimized on the prototype side, it's fair to have a such benchmark since the test cases are complicated enough for a prototype. Indeed V8 performs quite well. The project is under development and
25.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
I'm aware of that patent long before and not following the same structure. Besides, it also targets other languages by saying 'Javascript or similar'. No worries here. Thanks for reminding.
26.
▲
by
obastemur
13y ago
My colleague told me the comments here. I didn't mention clearly since it wasn't a big part of the picture. Dynamic Type part was a bigger problem! Right now I prefer a separate thread for GC but I have also couple of bad cases fo