o10449366

5 ms·

1.
by o10449366 15d ago
I experience this with many of the "advanced" models. I find they're actually the most efficient on their low/medium settings, occasionally high. Anything higher than that, and they start inventing more task list items t
2.
by o10449366 2mo ago
god i wish these low effort projects were banned from Show HN the entire premise of a "bullshit detector" that's entirely vibe-coded is laughable
3.
by o10449366 2mo ago
Unfortunately, I think it's just a continuation of a trend that already started pre-covid. I was surprised that most juniors and interns I worked with seemed to lack the ability to "self-help" and Google basic questions they
4.
by o10449366 2mo ago
Claude has always noticeably degraded under heavy load. Opus goes from "decent to work with" to "dumb intern" depending on whether you're working at 3 AM west coast or 10 AM - 5 PM. It's part of why I cancelled
5.
by o10449366 2mo ago
I think like the other commentator noted, I don't do this blindly, as I also wouldn't if I was instructing a junior engineer. I have a rough sense of how long it would take me to research all angles of the task. 5 minutes for a co
6.
by o10449366 2mo ago
/goal has replaced plan mode for me. This is the pattern I use for 95% of my AI work now: 1. Read X feature of Y and tell me when you fully understand it (if there's any detail missing in the summary, repeat until the context is p
7.
by o10449366 3mo ago
I feel like this benchmark reiterates my disbelief that anyone uses the latest Anthropic models for any productive work. They seem to be the best at burning tokens and spawning unnecessary subagents even for well-defined and tightly scoped
8.
by o10449366 4mo ago
I switched from Anthropic to OpenAI after spending ~$40K in equivalent token costs using Claude over 3 months. I found Opus 4.7 to be slow and wasteful with token usage. It's shocking how inefficient it is with tasks like bash tool usa
9.
Cancelling Claude subscription renewal immediately revokes Design access
5 points by o10449366 4mo ago|2 comments
10.
Cancelling Claude subscription renewal immediately revokes Design access
7 points by o10449366 4mo ago|1 comments
11.
by o10449366 4mo ago
The longest route on the NYC subway is precisely when you have an appointment and the train decides to stop because there's electrical issues, someone jumped on the track, "there's a train stopped ahead of us", the expre
12.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Idk, my recent experience with Claude is that 4.7 barely knows how to use basic bash tools - how to properly check when programs have finished running, even basic stuff like how to run pytest suites and read the failed tests from the output
13.
by o10449366 5mo ago
this is the most tired hn comment ever "X is just Y - why is it so complicated?" its lazy and boring to read these on every thread about a disliked big company
14.
by o10449366 5mo ago
I spent $24,096.47 in "API" costs with my $200 Claude Code Max subscription in April. I'm building my own saas. I spent 6 months writing the code by hand before using Claude, and that was fine, but its much faster to give the
15.
by o10449366 5mo ago
As unreliable as GitHub actions are, this is what ruins nice things (free for public repos) for the rest of us.
16.
by o10449366 5mo ago
I've been on the $200 plan for 3 months, but this will be my last month. I got great use out of 4.5 for a while, but 4.6 felt like a half step back (conflated with all the random hidden config changes during it), and 4.7 is genuinely t
17.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Cache create is 202,746,985 and cache read is 11,998,411,722 from claude-code-monitor
18.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Lol, spinning up swat teams because someone high up decides "drop everything this is my pet priority now" is politicking. It looks good for the leaders, meanwhile its the engineers pulling the all nighters and dealing with havin
19.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Yeah, I'm sure the numbers are a bit inflated compared to API, but with my Claude $200/month subscription I've supposedly consumed 12,160,410,828 tokens in April for a cost of $22,733.03.
20.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Yes, I throw away maybe 98% of the physical mail I receive. But I have to sort through it for the 2% that's maybe important and for some reason MUST be received by physical mail. There's obviously a lot of physical waste in this d
21.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Yeah and that statement also speaks to their test rigor if they make a change that big without thoroughly testing the edge case they're modifying.
22.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Resuming from sessions are still broken since Feb (I had to get claude to write a hook to fix that itself), the monitoring tool doesn't work and blocks usage of what does (simple sleep - except it doesn't even block correctly so y
23.
by o10449366 5mo ago
When you program, do you consider using your prior knowledge of programming cheating?
24.
by o10449366 5mo ago
So it sounds like you were using it on auto mode then if it went ahead and fixed the vulnerabilities without additional turns? If so, that isn't really a single prompt.
25.
by o10449366 5mo ago
I have the M3 Max MBP with 128 GB of memory and the 40 core GPU. What's the best local model I can run today for coding?
26.
by o10449366 5mo ago
What was your single prompt? That seems highly unlikely.
27.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Softbox lighting and it looks off because obviously no one lights their work desk like they would for a professional photo shoot.
28.
by o10449366 5mo ago
I've recently been looking for online backup providers and Backblaze came highly recommended to me - but I think after reading this article I'll look elsewhere because this kind of behavior seems like the first step on the path of
29.
by o10449366 5mo ago
Is it terrorism? radicalization seems like a pretty natural human response when your family/home/community gets indiscriminately obliterated by missiles from the sky.
30.
by o10449366 5mo ago
gee, i wonder who helped put those religious fanatics in power and have helped them retain power by raining down death from the sky

More ›