nunuvit

7 ms·

1.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It's a problem across all subjects. Out of necessity, academia historically selected for students who could learn from being read to just once without much context, and there was little pressure to fundamentally change the education fo
2.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It's not blackmail in the first place. There were no secrets to reveal since everything was published online, and it's legal to sue and report a possible crime. Speculating about the consequences doesn't make it blackmail.
3.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Science fiction is great like that, isn't it? The only limits are the author's imagination.
4.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Thank you for the tutorial! I don't mean to be greedy, but would you mind sharing your top MS Word typography tip that you think people should know? Aside from this one.
5.
by nunuvit 3y ago
In engineering practice, we often start using math without first consulting numerical analysts. It takes a long time to identify and fix the inevitable issues, which eventually becomes a lesson we have to teach students and practicing engin
6.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I think the future of these languages is largely as a target for code generation and transformation. Their legacy tooling-unfriendly designs is what's slowing this transition.
7.
by nunuvit 3y ago
> but the "ecosystem" just wasn't there I don't think it ever will be, either. Ada's "ecosystem" is really the tooling. I've seen plenty of Ada, but there's always been zero (or very nearly ze
8.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It's too late to edit my original comment. I was responding to the part about when you're breaking a lot of stuff all the time. Checking limits is for preventing breaks. Visualizing heat is for troubleshooting when they happen any
9.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I can't edit the comment now, but I worded it wrong. The quote only applies to exceeding maximum values. The visualization is much more useful if you've calculated worst-case. I use a thermal camera all the time.
10.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It takes 5 minutes to show someone how to read maximum values off a datasheet, and it makes the visualization 100x more useful.
11.
by nunuvit 3y ago
That's exactly what I'm saying.
12.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I explained in my other comment how it's a great tool for other jobs, but the wrong tool for this job. You won't learn how not to break things by ignoring the proper tool.
13.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Nothing. It's great. But it's the wrong tool for the job. Like teaching someone to stop a car by using the speedometer to estimate when to let go of the accelerator pedal, instead of introducing them to the brake pedal.
14.
by nunuvit 3y ago
So teach them to check the power and the paint will help them realize when they forget to do so.
15.
by nunuvit 3y ago
All you have to do is read the datasheet and multiply a few numbers to calculate worst-case power. Remembering to do that should be second nature, like remembering to close any parentheses you open. It's a great tool for understanding
16.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It's until the end of 2025, about 2.5 years from now. The comment was by GVR, who is presumably adding up all the pledged time to estimate whether there's enough in total.
17.
by nunuvit 3y ago
The title is fine. Sponsorship doesn't need to include a money a transfer.
18.
by nunuvit 3y ago
The workarounds require extra equipment and they're much more complicated. Better to wait for a more capable machine.
19.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Like I said, they're behind. Don't hold your breath for them to catch up.
20.
by nunuvit 3y ago
EA is actually working on the reliability problems now, but they're a few years behind.
21.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Not really. ABB is good at hardware protection, which is why the faults don't usually result in failures. Tesla is ahead in terms of anticipating, avoiding, and automatically handling such issues. The variety of cars absolutely creates
22.
by nunuvit 3y ago
It's a hardware reliability problem, and Tesla simply has the most advanced capability to tackle the problem in this product market.
23.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I think it's probably fine. It adds options for those who would rather die fighting. The exact placement of the line the FDA draws for approval doesn't align perfectly with everyone's values and situation, so there should be
24.
by nunuvit 3y ago
He could say you told him you had a gun, and brandished what looked like a gun. No reason to admit that it's really about the camera.
25.
by nunuvit 3y ago
> they'll be in the wrong the second they take action against you But like you said, they lied about you provoking them and destroyed the evidence showing that you didn't. Nobody will ever know that they beat you up just becaus
26.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I read it differently before, but I think you read it correctly.
27.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Yeah that's the error, as I interpret it. One comment mentioned slander, which is illegal. Project Veritas in the past has committed slander, and lost the resulting defamation suit. The response mentioned neutrality with regards to moc
28.
by nunuvit 3y ago
You answered your own question. The simple law of supply and demand can create unlivable wages for one. By controlling supply, you decide what types of people can make a livable wage. Maybe you want locals with families to have the opportun
29.
by nunuvit 3y ago
Ok, so let's remove the ban and the exceptions and make it legal to record anyone. Then you record a cop who doesn't want to be recorded. The cop beats you up, breaks your phone, and busts your lip. He and his five buddies say you
30.
by nunuvit 3y ago
I think we might be talking about different things. Slander is illegal. Political speech is constitutionally protected. How exactly does this relate to "neutrality"?

More ›