null08

7 ms·

1.
by null08 2y ago
Argh, I'm so sorry, I linked to the wrong New England paper in my post above. (That is a different major achievement from the same institution, but the above was industry funded as others correctly pointed out). The correct New England
2.
by null08 2y ago
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2402604
3.
by null08 2y ago
This article is about a phase III RCT that the hospital managed to do without major industry capital injection. This truly was a major achievement (I have been involved in a phase III RCT myself). It was published in the New England recentl
4.
by null08 2y ago
Interesting. I haven't seen much in this space since Lee Spector's "push" more than 20 years ago ( http://faculty.hampshire.edu/lspector/push.html ). I did see a mention of Push in the FAQ but it woul
5.
by null08 2y ago
The connection between SEMs and DAGs is really interesting. The underlying models are very similar but developed independently -- SEMs coming from the psychometrics tradition and popularized by Jöreskog, DAGs coming from Bayesian Networks a
6.
by null08 2y ago
I made the first version of this back in 2010, when Pearl's work on causal inference started impacting Epidemiology. A friend was an Epidemiologist and she told me about an MS-DOS program she was using to do something with graphs ( htt
7.
by null08 2y ago
Yes I had the same issue. But the wording "there is a < 5% probability that an outcome was the result of chance" is in fact problematic since many readers will go on to conclude "hence a >95% probability that the outcom