nuclearnice3

6 ms·

1.
by nuclearnice3 1y ago
Simple conclusions a) the people who have the stock now want to keep it and be more wealthy b) they don’t have much regard for your physical or mental health
2.
by nuclearnice3 1y ago
They might. I don’t rule it out. I have a more cynical view of the capabilities of the electorate. Another possible interpretation is Trump brought in a lot of uniformed voters. That group brings people who don’t care about policy or fall f
3.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
This opinion [1] from the judge in his case indicates that the murder-for-hire evidence was admitted during his trial. The document outlines the evidence for all 6 murder for hire allegations and explains why, although not charged, the evid
4.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
Fair point. You could also imagine it's an easier management task to have fungible employees. Sam quits. No risk to the company. Our employees are fungible. Sarah can step right in.
5.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
Strongly agree. Peopleware 1987 [1] > The first chapter of the book claims, "The major problems of our work are not so much technological as sociological in nature". The book approaches sociological or 'political' pr
6.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
Here's a delightful and illuminating 6 minute video which explains some of the purpose. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HB6UhGbyXfE Punchline at the end: "We don't say negative things about the art or the art
7.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
Getting a little beyond the headline, we find they had people wear blood pressure monitors and accelerometers and concluded: > More time spent exercising or sleeping, relative to other behaviors, was associated with lower BP. An addition
8.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
If you can get your hands on informs publications. https://www.informs.org/Publications
9.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
What was the substance of the criticism? There is a meeting or mismeeting between book and reader in math. Sometimes you are on the wrong footing to absorb a book. You bounce. Maybe you come back later and absorb the book. As far as the tit
10.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
In an overall excellent article with lots of tangible advice, I found the learning style bit weak. Wikipedia: "Although there is ample evidence that individuals express personal preferences on how they prefer to receive information,few
11.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
> I didn't imply anything should be read into it FYI, this sentence -- "It seems like every jobs report is lowered after the news cycle picks up the inflates numbers and they're free to adjust to the real data" -- gav
12.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
This page has a graph of cumulative revisions of the last two months. https://en.macromicro.me/charts/99068/nonfarm-payrolls-month... BLS explains why the revisions occur: "The initial estimate of job change
13.
by nuclearnice3 2y ago
Maybe not optimistic about Reagan. > On January 20, 1983 we read “THE HUMP: TWO YEARS OF REAGAN DONE AND TWO MORE TO YEARS GO.” He was of course to be disappointed in this, and Election Day 1984 is colored a somber black. In April 1986,
14.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
100% It's just nice that we can unite around our shared passion for correcting people who are wrong on the Internet.
15.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Please don't cross into personal attack, regardless of how provocative someone is being or you feel they are. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.
16.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
People like you? Like the original post, you aren't dealing with the substance, you're just slinging insults. You are violating the first guideline. Which I reproduce here and offer you an opportunity to apologize to me: "Be
17.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Right. Poster doesn't dispute any of the claims, just pours FUD on. As an example, the piece is clearly identified as an "interview." Presented as a dialogue between CASPAR SHALLER and MAGDA MALINOWSKA. Poster lodges this com
18.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
It won't surprise me if the photo or similar ends up banning your entire Google life with no reasonable appeal possible.
19.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Sounds right. Additional examples at https://github.com/louyx/aplus/blob/master/src/a/k.h https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum How would you characteriz
20.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Here is quits rate data for US nonfarm jobs. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JTSQUR In late 2021 and early 2022, the rate was the highest it had been in 20 years. Although people leave jobs all the time, this is a n
21.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Gotcha 93po. I intended only to playfully point out that YOUR comment hadn't engaged deeply with the substance. I overshot the mark and I apologize. Thank you for pointing out my mistake.
22.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
there were two questions. perhaps, opine, as an expression of your gratitude.
23.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
I like the way you think. Here's CPI for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Shelter in U.S. City Average. [1] Index level in August 2019 234.853 Index level in Sept 2023 280.869 An increase of 20%. Very similar to overall CPI. So rent
24.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Approximately $333k after 20% inflation over the period. https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=278200&year1=2... Yes, I think you are right to frame it as a supply shortage. The prices might be rational, eg
25.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Shelia Blair is a woman, not a dude. Her name is the first two words of the first sentence of the article. Is part of the reason it feels meaningless because you only read 10 words of content and it was difficult for CNN to pack a satisfyin
26.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
> I'm really surprised silent movies/tv isn't more common. Interesting comment. I gave it some thought. One place you can see the dynamics and opportunity for a language agnostic entertainment like you describe is YouTube
27.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Indeed. Your reasoning was echoed in this critique from Prof David Curtis, Honorary Professor, UCL Genetics Institute. > “Around 20% of young people in Denmark use cannabis but in this study fewer than 1% of the sample had been assigned
28.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
There's one kind of privacy where someone has an archive of all reddit comments ever and looks you up. There's another kind of privacy where your cousin sees your reddit user id and looks up your comment history and finds out you
29.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
Likewise the old home phone provided some monitoring of phone use. We've gained and lost so much.
30.
by nuclearnice3 3y ago
> If someone is commenting on the article without reading Yeah, I hear you. I note in my case, I read the article and posted about the clarifying sentence. I did find it funny that so many people were in an animated discussion about the

More ›