nrmitchi

5 ms·

1.
by nrmitchi 3d ago
Well that is a different thing and an entirely different provider than OpenAI/Anthropics ZDR promise.
2.
by nrmitchi 3d ago
The guarantee on this is a (contractual) “trust me bro”, and a right to try to sue a multi-trillion-dollar company who will absolutely drive you into the ground with legal red tape. If you are big enough to be able to withstand that, you’re
3.
by nrmitchi 4d ago
The "private market" at this point is so huge though that you'll have an "insiders" private market, and an "outsiders" public market to dump the bag on that the insiders don't care about.
4.
by nrmitchi 4d ago
It really doesn't matter. They're doing secondary offerings for employees and individual holders, and they'll have no issue allowing private transactions for larger holders. The general wealth distribution has shifted to the
5.
by nrmitchi 6d ago
> Sol xhigh is 90% on TB2.1 but 37% on TB4. Is it also "benchmaxxed"? Yes.
6.
by nrmitchi 15d ago
You seem to have ignored the second half of my response. In your case... you did it. This project, based on the current date, no data older than today, and the posters own statements, is "I asked gen-ai platform to make it for me, th
7.
by nrmitchi 15d ago
That's not what this is though. This is not (just) scraping job postings; the public-facing interface of this is "Greg, who I don't know, wants a job. Here are the jobs that I think would be good for Greg, who again, I don&#x
8.
by nrmitchi 15d ago
> If you've submitted a post to this month's 'Who Wants to Be Hired?", you can find your matching job listings at https://hnmatchmaker.com/user/:user_name , for example https://hnmatchm
9.
by nrmitchi 15d ago
From my experience, any time Fable sees anything loosely related to "linux" it throws a fit.
10.
by nrmitchi 15d ago
I don't mean to sound like I'm dismissing your experience, but are you sure ? I've (semi regularly, most of the time I'm even trying to use Fable) started with Fable, proceeded through my planning, and then at some poin
11.
by nrmitchi 16d ago
... > They are things that I would not be comfortable sending a cloud provider It's also an old machine that the commenter already has; it's intellectually dishonest to compare it to the price of a brand new, 4-iteration-newer
12.
by nrmitchi 21d ago
My concern about this isn't about the money. Frankly, no amount would actually satisfy everyone, and even an even-more-comically-large number won't materially impact Facebook (sorry, Meta). My concerns are: 1. This is an agreed se
13.
by nrmitchi 21d ago
No, but I sure as shit think it should be an opt-in feature that adults are aware of and can make a decision to turn on for themselves.
14.
by nrmitchi 22d ago
You are claiming (or pretending) that spend (ie, marketing spend) isn't one of, if not _the_, biggest factors in which of a set of options ends up being the winner? In this case you don't get to try the options first. You made a d
15.
by nrmitchi 22d ago
Many industries, and SpaceX particularly, will say this like this, then a couple years later be like "oh, it's actually much easier if we destroy it", _do it_, then claim "oh well, nothing to be done now!" and push
16.
by nrmitchi 22d ago
> voters cause election consensus, not spending This is potentially one of the most out of touch comments I've seen here in a while, and that's saying something.
17.
by nrmitchi 22d ago
*financial engineering
18.
by nrmitchi 23d ago
I doubt the point is to "make the money back". It's likely split between two goals: 1. Marketing and expressing to their customers that they are not falling behind, and 2. Insulating themselves from frontier labs jacking up p
19.
by nrmitchi 23d ago
Harvey and Clio both make entire products around this. They have raised billions of dollars. That's not really the point though; it doesn't have to be "legal specific". The key is in understanding that "Basic chatbo
20.
by nrmitchi 24d ago
This doesn’t sound as much that “LLMs can’t help me” as much as “trying to one-shot a complicated answer in a chatbot can’t help me”. Output straight from a generative model definitely should not be trusted. But that doesn’t mean that an
21.
by nrmitchi 24d ago
Anthropic's issues, as I see them, are: 1. They acted as if they were so far ahead capability wise that they could stop listening to their users. That is basically it. It is an extremely common belief that Opus 5 acts like a condesce
22.
by nrmitchi 25d ago
To be clear I do not believe it is intentional (nor do I believe I am somehow smarter or more knowledgable than the people running these processes). I believe it is (very) unfortunately converging on the communication style that currently m
23.
by nrmitchi 26d ago
I do not have evidence or data that supports this. It is only my thought. Claude, since Opus 5, speaks more and more like a wannabe-thought-leader pontificating on social media for engagement. Everything is a bait-then-switch, or a multi-
24.
by nrmitchi 26d ago
I struggled with this for a long time , but actually seem to have gotten to a place where this is largely resolved. Copy/paste from my current claude.md: The CC-5 rule specifically seems to be (just from reading through, nothing repea
25.
by nrmitchi 28d ago
> I feel that YC just invests in anything these days. When there is a popular gold rush, YC invests in many companies that do the same thing with the expectation that 1) a rising tide lifts all ships, and 2) if there is a clear winner, t
26.
by nrmitchi 29d ago
If you actually believe that he didn't , you are, at best, out of touch. His little "DOGE" endeavor was actively caught exfiltrating personal data about everyone in the country, and the first thing that happened after Spac
27.
by nrmitchi 1mo ago
The US has (especially recently) shown that "community aligned behavior" and "what those in power do" are very different. The US has also shown that the probability of someone being held accountable for massive abuse of
28.
by nrmitchi 1mo ago
"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither, pound the table." It's 2026; we can probably update "pound the table" to "pound social
29.
by nrmitchi 1mo ago
If Apple had published all of the details/data publicly, then they publicly could. But that is not the claim, and no one is even pretending that that's what happened.
30.
by nrmitchi 1mo ago
There are absolutely laws about IP theft. That's why it's called Intellectual Property . You really don't want the law to be "Well you didn't lose a physical thing, so why should it be illegal?"

More ›