nrawe

7 ms·

1.
by nrawe 4mo ago
This mirrors my own thoughts. Additionally, for businesses looking to replace people (particularly developers) with agentic AI, this is arguably worse from an accounting perspective as the cost of using these services will likely be pure Op
2.
by nrawe 5mo ago
My pet theory here is that Anthropic wants to be the end-to-end system for all software delivery on the web, with its model firmly at the centre of that universe. I have seen posts (but not confirmed) that as part of their recent breach was
3.
by nrawe 5mo ago
This is an excellent and distinctly frustrating game Echo comments on restart being faster; maybe having the % stats in the main ui somewhere. Will be recommending this to some friends.
4.
by nrawe 6mo ago
> The average knowledge worker maintains accounts across system after system, switching between applications hundreds of times per day. And they produce, in aggregate, a staggering amount of coordinated and collaborative activity that ne
5.
by nrawe 8mo ago
I've not heard that goal before. If true, it makes me sad to hear that once again, people confuse "More LOC == More Customer Value == More Profit". Sigh.
6.
by nrawe 10mo ago
As the manager is accountable for the problem being solved, they are responsible for making sure processes are optimal. There definitely should be an onus on individuals and teams to reflect and generate their own improvement actions to tha
7.
by nrawe 10mo ago
Depends where you go, these two terms get used interchangeably (incorrectly IMO) and so there is some semantic drift. If you were to read Julie Starr's "The Coaching Manual", or "The Coaching Habit", the definition
8.
by nrawe 10mo ago
The Coaching Habit is a fantastic book and is the right way to do. Managers don't exist to solve other peoples problems; it's vice versa. Managers are accountable for a problem, and responsible for building a team that can solve i
9.
by nrawe 10mo ago
I agree with some of the points here, but I roundly disagree. Agree with: people are employed to do a job, they should be empowered to get on and do it with minimal supervision, escalation, and distraction (particularly from "PR Theatr
10.
by nrawe 11mo ago
Many hours of fun it was running CounterStrike servers and writing my own plugins. Halcyon days :)
11.
by nrawe 1y ago
I agree the problem, but the given solution feels a bit clunky to me. From a syntax perspective, passing an options object and applying it over a set of defaults feels a lot cleaner. The reason kwargs work in Python is primarily because the
12.
by nrawe 1y ago
It's a great message, thanks for sharing.
13.
by nrawe 1y ago
This really made me laugh, thank you :)
14.
by nrawe 1y ago
I think you hit the nail on the head: React is a good fit for certain solutions (like interactivity rich web applications), while not a good fit for others (like adding minor interactivity into a form). There are trade offs to React vs Vue
15.
by nrawe 1y ago
Hi hopelite. I typed out a decently detailed response to your message, but decided to cut it short. I think we probably have a profoundly different viewpoint and set of experiences which would be too much to try and reconcile here. I'l
16.
by nrawe 1y ago
Right, supporting PA is illegal, opposing what's happening in Gaza is not. That's why I specifically didn't say having a placard with a message supporting PA, but "Stop Genocide in Palestine". That is the detail tha
17.
by nrawe 1y ago
I should note that my comparison was to a US organisation proscribed as an eco-terror organisation, the name of which escapes me, and which I couldn't find in a quick scan back through my reading or here[0]. I came across them through
18.
by nrawe 1y ago
I appreciate that with recent articles shared here it might look that way. What is difficult as a Brit reading this is that so little has actually changed that I can't quite grasp what you mean. Firstly, the paper reporting the "p
19.
by nrawe 1y ago
As a Brit, I'd agree that it's not ideal. However, the characterisation of terrorist scare in the 2000's, is somewhat off. Over the course of the last two decades, there have been numerous terrorist attacks, most notably 7&#x
20.
by nrawe 1y ago
I'll stand to be wrong, but I believe in one case a member of staff and two police officers were also assaulted. Terrorism isn't necessarily about body count, it's about motivation. If the motive is political change, and the
21.
by nrawe 1y ago
So, here's the thing, the BBC has a whole section of its news site dedicated to the conflict, including documentation of alleged atrocities committed by Israel and Hamas. Its produced documentaries detailing the settlers movement. The
22.
by nrawe 1y ago
I'm happy to be wrong, but I don't believe that's correct. There have been some people arrested for inciting violence via social media during the Southport riots. There is also Tommy Robinson/Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, who h
23.
by nrawe 2y ago
Of course not. There are people facing genuine harassment, death threat, rape threat every day; that's what the law protects against. If you were to dox me, threaten mine and my families life repeatedly, spread lies about me that convi
24.
by nrawe 2y ago
I agree with your point about Putin waiting for the WH administration to change. Were the president hawkish on Russia, however, I still doubt Putin would back down. Putin needs to be seen to win at home to play to his core base. Biden would
25.
by nrawe 2y ago
You seem to have overlooked the clause 179.1.C. If I send a death threat to someone, or I incite violence by spreading misinformation (like happened in Southport) there are consequences. That's what it covers, not a random tweet that s
26.
by nrawe 2y ago
Yeah, I think they'll fold on that point, too, but the main stumbling block for Ukraine is that Russian guarantees mean little in a post-2021 invasion context given they made the same overtures after 2014. The idea of the entire countr
27.
by nrawe 2y ago
Right, but that's not a free speach issue. I can critise a public officials handling of a situation, or disagree with a policy, or publicly protest a law, and not go to prison. I cannot be wantonly offensive about a minister just becau
28.
by nrawe 2y ago
So, watching the video as a brit with a number if Ukrainian friends and colleagues, my first reaction is that this is the Trump Whitehouse looking for a cheap win. However, I think their calculation here speaks to the difficulty of the curr
29.
by nrawe 2y ago
They are the US's proxy against Iran in the Middle East, primarily, which makes it a strategic relationship. Addition, based on the 2022 data, the US imported $21BB from Israel and had a trade deficit of ~$7BB.
30.
by nrawe 2y ago
I'm not American, but my read of this announcement looks something like: * The Trump Administration doesn't believe in the two state solution stalemate. * They have leverage over The Netanyahu Administration in Israel due to the o

More ›