nothingnew2

5 ms·

1.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
That is true enough. In this case, I think a useful learning outcome is that the backwards reading is, in theory and ignoring the emotional word choices, as politically extreme as the forwards reading. However, I doubt most will see it this
2.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
It's better than "polarised but unbalanced".
3.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
Polarised, but still balanced due to the symmetric nature of the poem's structure!
4.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
I think you've missed the entire point of the structure of the poem - the backward reading (ie, immigrants may share my home and food) is as "tame" as the forward reading. >That means you must also oppose empathetic messag
5.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
I like how you get to read it in the direction you most agree with. Very politically balanced!
6.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
Sure. https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?&_nkw=nokia+105&_sacat=0 YMMV, depending what cellular bands are available in your country.
7.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
I've succesfully rolled out a (IMHO) better version of the "Freedom" app, that comes with a load of other benefits like being cheaper and even more effective. My phone can only make calls and texts because it's a dumb
8.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
>in the hands of a kid, today's phone technology and it's inability to stop this crap it's the incarnation of evil. Yet you continue to pay his phone bills.
9.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
Rejecting "technology" is, IMHO, a perfectly rational response to the typical layers of consultants, sales teams, and general lack of knowledge of the fundamentals of tech that result in the isses described above. You can't w
10.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
We have been ensnared by our own technology. https://netfuture.org/2001/Nov1501_125.html
11.
by nothingnew2 3y ago
Have you ever tried making this complaint? In the context of OP's comment about schools and technology, you will only ever get told "well, everyone else wants this". Sadly, this is true.