not_a_cop75

7 ms·

1.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
And asbestos is a very generic term. There are certain particle sizes that are absolutely harmful and others that pose little to no effect. There should be a name for the dangerous particles regardless of meterial. Silicosis agents?
2.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
How's the 3d printing landscape for metal overall? I hear there have been made great strides in 3d printers that rely on sintering. Very affordable relatively speaking. Any other methods that have gained traction?
3.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
I mean 15 dollars an hour might be enough to live in a sewer in New York. It's hard to imagine this has a huge affect on anyone.
4.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Foreign agents are always discussed because frankly, they are almost completely outside of the law. But what about non-foreign agents? Surely, they exist, and the ones that break the laws to get their way should be thrown in jail, but when
5.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
php, whether you like the language, or abhor it, has always had some of the most useful documentation, I've found.
6.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
I guess someone here IS a fan of echo chambers.
7.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Moderation does not unbiased news make. Everything is biased. What you have is the news you are already biased towards - your own personal echo chamber.
8.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Of course, cowards will always downvote without participation. That is the one true known.
9.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Not a fan of echo chambers. I'd rather be wrong once in a while than happy in my ignorance.
10.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Left or right should not automatically validate or invalidate any news source. Dishonest people do not adhere to any single political bent.
11.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Another thing you should note is even though The New York Times is "the newspaper of record" there are tons of things they get consistently wrong, and seldom ever retract an iota as far as I've seen. You also have in the news
12.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
What you just said is totally acceptable as opinion. But claiming "they deliberately craft misleading and false stories" is not provable by your person, since you do not yourself work there. There are people who really believe the
13.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
The messenger does not automatically discredit the message. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
14.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Do you have some personal insider knowledge to substantiate this with? I mean I have some pretty heavy personal bias about the Washington Post being pro Amazon, and I would totally understand it if it was. But even then, I can't make a
15.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
It's nice to say it's luck, sure, and make everyone feel like they have a fair chance. However, I'm pretty certain the ones that obsess and plan the most to get rich and squeeze every little bit out they can into their plans
16.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
I stopped with Facebook because of spying and narcissism. I stopped with Twitter because of selective tweet promotion and targeting - you're effectively giving a group power over your life guiding you what is right to watch or be conce
17.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
I don't know. One is the person dedicated to the ideals of a tribe. The other dedicated to a tribe winning at all costs. I'm really not an at all costs kind of guy. If my tribe ideals are good and needed, they should be elected.
18.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
This is the problem with most publications. It's get the news out first, rather than research and try to be unbiased. Bias is unfortunately what our news is today.
19.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Is it impossible to discuss the merit of an article without stating "This is too far right"????
20.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Honestly, trust this is bad because we said so is not a logical response. At least hot link to the opinion of why.
21.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Is somebody automatically disreputable based upon their political affiliation? If so, perhaps MacCarthyism is alive and well! It would be fair game, of course to analyze the article and list the reasons it is or isn't accurate.
22.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
While true, and obvious to experienced drivers, not every light is vertical. Some are horizontally placed.
23.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
But why?
24.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
I'm sorry. Perhaps you should legalize a sport that purposely kills people. Tell me how that works out for you. And for the record, I don't care for football or hockey. They can both wither on the vine for all I care.
25.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
While we're at it, can we insist that all lights use blue-green instead of just green? That could help those that suffer from color blindness.
26.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
"But Johnson said it could take 10 years before such outages are "really ratcheted down significantly." " Strikes me as a CEO that suddenly wants very much to have his golden parachute and be out of this pickle.
27.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Also, if you haven't noticed, the Aztecs were historically very violent people. If you look at the people of middle america, it's no surprise they are still violent today. This happens when you have societies that do not adequatel
28.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Genetics actually pass significant personality traits down. https://www.verywellmind.com/are-personality-traits-caused-b... Genetics is suddenly very unpopular as it can predict negative traits. Imagine that.
29.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Keep up on Fish Oil Supplements. I forget where I read it, but there was a publication which attributed depression to living far from the coast. From there the idea circulated that a fish based diet would be beneficial. Omega3 fats are gene
30.
by not_a_cop75 7y ago
Thanks for the downvote, Chinese sympathizers.

More ›