nostream

7 ms·

1.
by nostream 8y ago
So far, I have not heard anyone who has found any security holes and I'm active in the #WireGuard IRC channel with 300+ users, where many have looked at the code. There may be some unscrupulous hacker who has reviewed the code and foun
2.
by nostream 8y ago
I've never really understood what was controversial with TunSafe more than it was closed source so it was hard for others to review the code, but now it's open source. As a former fan of WireGuard, I would STRONGLY advise against
3.
by nostream 8y ago
I'm a big fan of WireGuard. But it gives a bad taste in the mouth to know that the author banned a WireGuard fan and user from the IRC channel just because he took time to code and release a free Windows client for the protocol. And th
4.
by nostream 9y ago
zx2c4: I've been waiting for quite a while, how far away in time is shortly? "appears to speak the protocol some of the time, or merely implementing a protocol at all" ludde: Is the wireguard protocol fully implemented or jus
5.
by nostream 9y ago
zx2c4: Which language is the linux version of wireguard written in?
6.
by nostream 9y ago
zx2c4: I've looked at the Go version on your homepage, but the initial text in the git project. "This is not a complete implementation of WireGuard ..... There is no group of users that should use the code in this repository here
7.
by nostream 9y ago
zx2c4: I appreciate your software but I think it's good with alternatives, and your attitude is a bit harsh. Why not support alternatives? Isn't the main reason with open-source communication protocols to inspire people to make al
8.
by nostream 9y ago
Cool news! zx2c4: Would it be possible for you to configure the WireGuard demo server so that it detects if there are interoperability issues with other clients?