noobermin

6 ms·

1.
Ask HN: Open-source AI policies and "responsbility"
1 points by noobermin 10d ago|0 comments
2.
by noobermin 12d ago
Open ai has been allowed to do dubious things that would be illegal in any sane society but alas they aren't in this world. What's different about this? They play with a different set of rules than we do.
3.
by noobermin 13d ago
This is the bed all you AI hypers made. Now all manner of disparate tools fall under the banner of AI, with something like this that are not LLMs or transformer type tool, they happen to get lumped with all the rest of them.
4.
by noobermin 15d ago
So Altman and Amodei should retire?
5.
by noobermin 15d ago
750 comments but I can't believe how bad this article is. The paragraph on MAU says similarweb is untrustworthy but then cites "most estimates"...which? Sorry, I can't read this without thinking you're biased agains
6.
by noobermin 1mo ago
I will say 50% of HN is responsible for the state of things today with attention. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
7.
by noobermin 3mo ago
The top comment right now is essentially explaining my issue here. My problem isn't really the pro or anti stance, this is a booster account that is farming off of the engagement. This has been a thing since musk introduced paid premiu
8.
by noobermin 3mo ago
Given the incentives (an ai booster account who is also prompting chat to write his posts) does this even belong on HN? I feel like our standards have dropped so much in the last two years.
9.
by noobermin 3mo ago
Tbf, this current era of capitalism really is a lot where absolutely no one wants to enter the market and take advantage of a clear overpricing of memory for consumers but simply wants to charge the same amount as everyone else. So much for
10.
by noobermin 3mo ago
You can't be serious about conflating a host of technologies with fucking image generation or all things. This is the worst HN comment I've seen in months and there's been loads of competition.
11.
by noobermin 3mo ago
You shouldn't promote something like this as being useful for medical purposes, because some patients might think this is real and start sending their doctors these "scans" or even worse, some shitty doctors will use them to
12.
by noobermin 3mo ago
Clearly something like this would need to be approved by the FDA, it is literally irresponsible to promote something like this as being more powerful than a MRI.
13.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Man no wonder ai wows a lot of HN posters. This can't be the default attitude of developers today.
14.
by noobermin 4mo ago
This is likely because the government fears of protests. Just like the bans in the west were mostly about anti Israel/ pro Palestinian rhetoric, this is a response to the anti Government protests last year in Indonesia and elsewhere. T
15.
by noobermin 4mo ago
American moderates are amazing. "Let's see how suburban republicans feel about this that Trump has done! He's really spoiled his chances next election!" You guys have been waiting for the non-fascist republican voter for
16.
by noobermin 4mo ago
He just needs to profess his love for our country (the president, you know how Trump says attacks on him are attacks on the whole country) and may be say he has dirt on the deep state or hasan piker or something. Trump will be inviting him
17.
by noobermin 4mo ago
There is no contradiction between the points made so far. His base loves it and the majority of americans do not. He won by a marginal victory just like in 2016. The current system favors the Rs and the Rs have worked to gerrymander every s
18.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Also there is a bit of inertia. In people's imaginations, the US still seems to glimmer, even if the reality isn't the same.
19.
by noobermin 4mo ago
I will say, there are a non-zero number of people who were rooting for Trump and the American right wing in general who are now surprised the fascists are turning on them. I don't know, it's hard to have sympathy for some of you.
20.
by noobermin 4mo ago
>I don't really get why some people seem to think that it's somehow better to have their bullet point prompt as a huge text. Because they want to mislead you.
21.
by noobermin 4mo ago
At this point, I think google, openai, anthropic, etc already realise this and are just trying to pretend this isn't true. I even think some C-suite who are not in AI companies but are boosters know this too. This has been true since 2
22.
by noobermin 4mo ago
So, I'm not really a mathematician, but the first 3-8 pages reads like nonsense and a bunch of unrelated facts. A bit surreal may be, but if this the norm for this kind of thing, I'm amazed it arrives at any useful result at all.
23.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Trying to get your money out while there's still time! Quickly now!
24.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Be sure to give it your bank account details and pin number too, so it can fill out that section of the 1040.
25.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Of course just like they did with engineering IP china will not respect such a thing.
26.
by noobermin 4mo ago
I think the context makes it clear this is about llms and generative ai, not everything that includes a NN
27.
by noobermin 4mo ago
It's tempting to assume malice, I don't doubt some of them really are so spiteful, but I assume most are just that out of touch.
28.
by noobermin 4mo ago
There once was an rpg that had you move boxes around and fight random box encounters, and the battles were likewise just deducting each other's hp in turn with a rng. There was no dialogue I can recall. Basically similar spirit but I r
29.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Frankly, if you think this, why do you think you're special? If people using LLMs are bad, how are you not also subject to the same issues they are?
30.
by noobermin 4mo ago
Is there a citation for this? This was my suspicion but it's quite amazing if this was the actual reason for the bun spectacle

More ›