nonhaver

5 ms·

1.
by nonhaver 1y ago
haha brutal. maybe tomorrow
2.
by nonhaver 1y ago
ill leave it at this: if “zero-hallucination omniscience” is your bar, you’ll stay disappointed - and that’s on your expectations, not the tech. personally i’ve been coding/researching faster and with fewer retries every time a new mod
3.
by nonhaver 1y ago
thats hilarious actually. gives credence to the gpt theory haha
4.
by nonhaver 1y ago
not to offend - but it sounds like your response/worries are based more on an emotional reaction. and rightly so, this is by all means a very scary and uncertain time. and undeniably these companies have not taken into account the impa
5.
by nonhaver 1y ago
i didnt bring examples because i said personal experience. heres my "evidence" - gpt 4 took multiple shots and iterations and couldnt stay coherent with a prompt longer than 20k tokens (in my experience). then when o4 came out it
6.
by nonhaver 1y ago
you dont remember deepseek introducing reasoning and blowing benchmarks led by private american companies out of the water? with an api that was way cheaper? and then offered the model free in a chat based system online? and you were a big
7.
by nonhaver 1y ago
this is a very odd perspective. as someone who uses LLMs for coding/PRs - every time a new model released my personal experience was that it was a very solid improvement on the previous generation and not just meant to "confuse&qu
8.
by nonhaver 1y ago
i think this is more an effect of releasing a model every other month with gradual improvements. if there was no o-series/other thinking models on the market - people would be shocked by this upgrade. the only way to keep up with the m
9.
by nonhaver 1y ago
also wondering this. had to pause the livestream to make sure i wasnt crazy. definitely eyebrow raising
10.
by nonhaver 1y ago
there exists tools that can zero shot complex tasks (claude/codex). bar has been raised and jules doesn’t stack up. knowing google it will probably improve in due time
11.
by nonhaver 1y ago
similar experience. i would put codex over claude personally due to the better rate limits (of which i haven’t hit once yet even on extensive days) but jules was not very good - too messy and i prefer alternative outputs to creating a pull
12.
by nonhaver 1y ago
thats so insane
13.
by nonhaver 1y ago
wild take: critique != censorship. people can consume whatever they want and we can call out when the supply chain is built on unconsented scraping and zero stewardship CamperBob2
14.
by nonhaver 1y ago
Well put and reflects my thoughts exactly. It's borderline concerning there are people who consume this type of media by choice and forethought.
15.
by nonhaver 1y ago
Absolutely horrendous - well and truly. Ignoring the dystopic undertones of a product like this - the audio quality is low and filled with artifacts and destroyed transients. Voices are robotic and generic with basically zero emotion. Lyric
16.
by nonhaver 1y ago
if im understanding correctly this was a public bucket? aside from the obvious leaking of data couldnt this also be subject to a DoW (denial of wallet) attack where a user could auto download all the images constantly on a VPS and cause a m
17.
by nonhaver 1y ago
ah man they got us. we thought it was spam when it was a social experiment all along. now look whos got egg on their face.
18.
by nonhaver 1y ago
impressive evals. i wonder how much of that can be attributed to the enhanced context understanding. i feel like that/length are the bottleneck of the majority of commercial models.
19.
by nonhaver 1y ago
not sure why people feel the need to complain in the comments of this anniversary post for a free service. been using the MDN docs for 5+ years and its been an invaluable resource that also promotes exploration - ive stumbled upon so many i
20.
by nonhaver 1y ago
100% - mixed with intellisense you get to explore a lib a lot more than just pasting a whole section
21.
by nonhaver 1y ago
this is great. i think extensions that detect generated music, speech, video, or text will become really important. im curious how light and performant these detection models can get. maybe a single extension could handle multiple media typ
22.
by nonhaver 1y ago
dont forget blinkies! https://adriansblinkiecollection.neocities.org/
23.
by nonhaver 1y ago
was this written by ai? > Audio Processing | Basic effects, limited voices | Complex DSP, many simultaneous sources | 150-400% what? the web audio api is incredibly robust and performant. there is certainly no cap on voices besides memor