Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noisy_boy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
noisy_boy
4d ago
Your sarcastic refutation of the allegedly ridiculous assertion was devoid of any counterpoints on how the US government can stop China's progress in AI and what you think they are going to do about it. Just repeating it doesn't m
2.
▲
by
noisy_boy
4d ago
$200/year, now .
3.
▲
by
noisy_boy
4d ago
> They also made clothing orders of magnitude cheaper for everyone else. They also contributed to consumerism and use-and-throw culture and mounds of waste around the world. People were not mortgaging their homes to buy clothes. There wa
4.
▲
by
noisy_boy
4d ago
I agree on all your points. I'm just saying, that the $5 tier is not a honest to good option. The $10 one is but they can make the $5 one genuine too by increasing the quota. I'm sure they have done their research and maybe increa
5.
▲
by
noisy_boy
5d ago
> because it includes access to many LLMs. That is interesting, which LLMs? Asking as someone paying monthly Claude subscription.
6.
▲
by
noisy_boy
5d ago
Or just paying them. If they have access to resources, they have access to things of monetary value. Paying people will be vastly more powerful than it is even now when people's options of gainful employment keep dwindling. Robot army
7.
▲
by
noisy_boy
5d ago
We have an intellectual structure that has been largely the same irrespective of the level of technological advancement. The brightest among us think about hard problems. Even though all of us may not understand those advances, we all appre
8.
▲
by
noisy_boy
5d ago
We should enjoy the advancement. I also think the AI companies solving this or such problems with rewards shouldn't get any cash - that's the least they can do for human advancement having stolen the entirety of human knowledge an
9.
▲
by
noisy_boy
5d ago
> Worth the $5 for me Steep at 300 searches per month or about 10 per day. If you search often, it is too expensive. If you rarely search, not worth 5 bucks. They are plainly trying to push people to their $10 unlimited plan. I would hav
10.
▲
by
noisy_boy
6d ago
We moved a few months ago and it was so satisfying seeing the inventory of cables I had been saving for years getting used up. The cable-watermark in the box actually started noticably lowering. Nobody gave me the loud praise I deserved but
11.
▲
by
noisy_boy
7d ago
> microorganisms take their time to grow and no LLM in the world can make them go faster Rate limited by biology. Love that.
12.
▲
by
noisy_boy
7d ago
MCP when token budget is running low. The web interface is token frugal because it has to work with whatever I provide.
13.
▲
by
noisy_boy
7d ago
Deniability on intention. Models can hallucinate, all bets are off. Sure, they can make it stricter but why do that and subject themselves to harder scrutiny based on the training criteria?
14.
▲
by
noisy_boy
8d ago
Given v12 just came out and has a bunch of warnings regarding migration, I'm not going to jump on it yet. This is pre-v12 issue.
15.
▲
by
noisy_boy
8d ago
I wasn't aware of this - thanks, I will give it a try.
16.
▲
by
noisy_boy
9d ago
Subtitles are the Achilles heel of Jellyfin (at least the Android client sending the stream to Chromecast stick connected to the TV). I can see the subtitle present but it doesn't show on the movie. Ok, I will just add manually - can&#
17.
▲
by
noisy_boy
9d ago
I got that. I'm saying that it is deliberate. Wiggle room et all.
18.
▲
by
noisy_boy
9d ago
> I find it odd that discussions of alignment don't mention 'legality' Because other wishy-washy stuff doesn't involve prison. Not that our new oligarchs with the politicians in their pockets have any real risk of it,
19.
▲
by
noisy_boy
9d ago
All devices in my home sit behind adguard. The TV can try all it wants.
20.
▲
by
noisy_boy
11d ago
Telemetry?
21.
▲
by
noisy_boy
11d ago
I see it as laying the groundwork for firing. This is bound to blow-up in production eventually which would be a good enough excuse. If it doesn't, reduce token budget and squeeze some more until it breaks.
22.
▲
by
noisy_boy
11d ago
> Why is OpenAI getting a free pass for this illegal behaviour? They are not confessing, they are bragging. It is the new humble brag.
23.
▲
by
noisy_boy
11d ago
Even that would be acceptable. But they still blame the programmer, who was pressured into this, for any fallouts because of it. Basically trying to have it both ways. The unreasonableness of it is infuriating.
24.
▲
by
noisy_boy
16d ago
Raspberry pi + adguard + tailscale could be a good solution for you. Browser agnostic, you get an admin dashboard to manage the white/blacklists, see logs of the attempts and other goodies. Bonus, this combination works on mobile too.
25.
▲
by
noisy_boy
17d ago
Good culture is basically dont-be-an-asshole culture. Which is very hard to do. In a distant past, my team was one of the teams under a senior manager. This guy never threw his weight around, asked questions, listened to us, trusted us and
26.
▲
by
noisy_boy
24d ago
How will you get bonus if you don't do anything different? How will you do anything different if you don't ignore/brush-aside past successes and focus on replacing them with new things? How will you replace them without fund
27.
▲
by
noisy_boy
25d ago
If you have read Cursor's obtuse verbosity (auto mode), Claude's talk comes across as sober and level-headed. Everytime I am about to complain about Claude, I'm reminded of that and am thankful that my main budget is allocate
28.
▲
by
noisy_boy
25d ago
> The law is not “hackable.” The point the sibling comments miss is that for the hoi polloi, this one-weird-trick does not work because such laws has been written to broaden the scope as much as possible by heavily relying on intent inst
29.
▲
by
noisy_boy
1mo ago
Everybody generally agrees on what is garbage. Lot of senior management doesn't think AI is garbage or even if they privately think so, they don't say that openly. Falling in line, peer pressure, not wanting to come across as anti
30.
▲
by
noisy_boy
1mo ago
> it will need at least some level of supervision from an actual expert. An expert? An expert or two? Maybe a few experts? Sure, even that is a lot less than how many we use today. Therein lies the issue.
More ›