nogox

6 ms·

1.
Clusterless Kubernetes Job(blog.hyper.sh)
2 points by nogox 8y ago|0 comments
2.
by nogox 9y ago
Per-minute billing makes more sense to EC2, given the reason above.
3.
by nogox 9y ago
Or Azure ACI. Per-second billing doesn't add much value to EC2.
4.
by nogox 9y ago
I think the per-second billing is off the point. How does it help, if the EC2 instance takes tens of seconds to launch, and tens of seconds to bootstrap? To make the most of per-second billing, the compute unit should be deployed within sec
5.
by nogox 9y ago
Try hyper.sh. They are the new Heroku for Docker.
6.
by nogox 9y ago
Is it Docker Mac?
7.
ZEIT or Hyper – a new Heroku emerging(redmonk.com)
1 points by nogox 9y ago|0 comments
8.
by nogox 9y ago
5 seconds boot + per-second billing is the killer feature.
9.
Ask HN: Does per-second billing make sense for GPU Instance?
1 points by nogox 9y ago|0 comments
10.
by nogox 9y ago
If you have the Docker images, try hyper.sh. The easiest and fastest way to deploy apps with Docker.
11.
by nogox 9y ago
If you use Docker, try Hyper.sh
12.
by nogox 9y ago
Did you try runV. It launches a Docker image into a micro VM in 100ms. github.com/hyperhq/runv
13.
Running Windows Container on Linux Host(twitter.com)
7 points by nogox 9y ago|0 comments
14.
Great deck explaining the diff between Docker,CoreOS,Opendeis,Hyper,Joyent,ECS [pdf](blog.hyper.sh)
2 points by nogox 10y ago|0 comments
15.
by nogox 10y ago
Are you using Docker to deploy your project? If yes, check out hyper.sh. Insanely easy!
16.
by nogox 10y ago
Where do you run the CI containers? AWS?
17.
by nogox 10y ago
That's the point. Serverless is only cost effective in low traffic cases. If you get a stable or high volume of request, a traditional server is way cheaper.
18.
by nogox 10y ago
How is rancher related?
19.
by nogox 10y ago
Looks very simple to deploy a few containers. Nice work!
20.
by nogox 11y ago
I'm curious how scalable Hypernetes is. As it is based on K8s, will it support 1k nodes?
21.
by nogox 11y ago
Check www.hyper.sh and https://github.com/hyperhq/runv They can boot a new VM with Docker images in 200ms, which is very close to LXC, and perfectly isolated by hypervisor. The problem of "Virtual Machine" is
22.
by nogox 11y ago
Hi Solomon, It is great to hear you guys are working on that. I find Hyper is pretty interesting to run Docker on Mac https://hyper.sh/blog/post/2015/07/30/running-containers-fro... .
23.
by nogox 11y ago
It also runs on Mac! https://hyper.sh/blog/post/2015/07/30/running-containers-fro...
24.
by nogox 11y ago
Why? unikernel is quite opinioned imo.
25.
by nogox 11y ago
Try this: https://docs.hyper.sh/get_started/darwin.html
26.
by nogox 11y ago
Been following Hyper. Absolutely love this!
27.
by nogox 11y ago
How do they handle the isolation in a multi-tenant environment?
28.
by nogox 11y ago
check out hyper.sh, this is the future of public CaaS. After all, you don't need EC2 to host your containers, if you can run them directly with a hypervisor.
29.
by nogox 11y ago
Check out https://medium.com/@hyperhq/docker-hyper-and-the-end-of-gues... I think this is the way Container-as-a-Service to go, instead of the current form of AWS ECS.
30.
by nogox 11y ago
I like the idea of immutable infrastructure. If I can manage my app as code, I'm in.

More ›