nobodywillobsrv

6 ms·

1.
by nobodywillobsrv 6d ago
But in chemical science you would not "understand" everything. You cook with ingredients where you don't fully understand then. There are always limits. Engineering human types are often guilty of saying something is low cost
2.
by nobodywillobsrv 6d ago
This is the kind of writing that I assume the people who read the NYT or Atlantic enjoy. The content is good but yes it's like there is a different class of people that really want to FEEL like they are reading. They are doing THE WORK
3.
by nobodywillobsrv 7d ago
The real annoying thing it seems is mostly that openai is presumably doing this for internal reasons and this marginally increases the cost to users with no real gain. It would be one thing to gain from it but removing prestige wins from cu
4.
by nobodywillobsrv 18d ago
I see this response a lot. What part of the thinking are you thinking is actually offloaded? Writing things down and then arguing with an agent that constantly gets things wrong is just a new kind of Rubber Duck. Are Rubber Ducks offloading
5.
by nobodywillobsrv 22d ago
It's funny to read HN comments where people can sort of describe the problems but can't really describe the problems
6.
by nobodywillobsrv 22d ago
Good story and the classic problem with nearly all betting markets having viaticals embedded
7.
by nobodywillobsrv 1mo ago
Seems causally false.
8.
by nobodywillobsrv 1mo ago
Markets solve this by pricing risk. Ideally you would have some kind of notion of selling insurance internally and track things. But ultimately existential risk is hard to negotiate from the inside. And companies are supposed to go bust or
9.
by nobodywillobsrv 1mo ago
I have many projects going, many tmux sessions, but I also found I don't resonate with the post either. Yes, there are times I use AI and it doesn't go anywhere and wasn't necessary but I don't think I can always know th
10.
by nobodywillobsrv 1mo ago
Yes. This is basically true but unclear the causal link to the true problems.
11.
by nobodywillobsrv 1mo ago
This seems to misrepresent what incentives are: latent unobservable things. Incentives are not what you or anyone else says they are. It makes sense to simply state the incentives in academic games which are of course useful at times. So th
12.
by nobodywillobsrv 2mo ago
I've noticed while not really looking but taking some chats that turn into interviews is that the job market seems covered with spam, semi scams, weird processes and teams and people that are living in the dark ages still in terms of A
13.
by nobodywillobsrv 2mo ago
Stop calling it social media. Call it something like the matrix. Isolating specialized customized algorithms tube to be addicted to specifically you and tuned to keep you away from other humans forever. Instead of identity barriers like in
14.
by nobodywillobsrv 2mo ago
Feels like it would be a good time for freenet and the like to catch on.
15.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
Letting AI write for you is the main purpose though. It should always have been trained on "is this more readable for humans" but as a actual tested thing.
16.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
The next level up is the payoff, the incentives like taleb tripe
17.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
Whild I hate the idea of a zillionaire tax, and I largely think good allocators should allocate, I also recognize that simply pricing things and allowing them to be bought is unstable in many cases. If you can use it to take over a country
18.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
Why not tax the gov though? "Nobody should have that much control" means you must first have limited government and some mechanism to stop unstable governance dynamics which allow for capture. Currently it seems like billionaires
19.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
This makes me feel like an alien. I feel perfectly happy sorting by worst taking the top K and then understanding what can be mitigated etc Not doing this is immoral IMO. But I hear and understand certain kinds of people who say they can&#x
20.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
Yes. People are gatekeeping. They are not interviewing with the aim of having an interesting conversation. They are trying to block hiring.
21.
by nobodywillobsrv 3mo ago
Interviews, all of them, should be working on problem with and agent and a human interviewer. Just had a "guess the teachers password" moment at some interview as a senior and the interviewer didn't understand my answer and d
22.
by nobodywillobsrv 4mo ago
Please correct me if wrong but this has almost nothing to do with broad human dehydration or hydration. I think it is an interesting finding and it would be interesting to hear more about the implications from someone in the field. I only b
23.
by nobodywillobsrv 4mo ago
This feels like these kind of bad incentive problems we always here about on here ... Like bugs and vipers.
24.
by nobodywillobsrv 4mo ago
I understand and agree with the feeling but then I also feel AI is too slow and too expensive. My most successful autonomous runs have been expanding scrapers across a number of similar but different portals. I had examples and targets and
25.
by nobodywillobsrv 5mo ago
Would be interesting to understand if walls and short focus vs trees and natural stuff further out is preferable. When I was working more vision was always a bottleneck ... Staring at yet more close things would be less useful than staring
26.
by nobodywillobsrv 5mo ago
Yes I simply do not understand how these kind of stories pass the editors except that they are not important if wrong. If this was some kind of crime they would have censored information for a long while if not clearly correct.
27.
by nobodywillobsrv 5mo ago
How much does it cost though? This is the problem. I think there is a huge gap between people on salaries getting effectively more responsibility by being given spend that they otherwise would not have had and people hustling on projects on
28.
by nobodywillobsrv 6mo ago
Yes it is insane. I am in same boat and have received mortgage applications, police details, applications for police jobs, massage receipts you name it. Many would be considered important leaks of customer data. I have even had founder leve
29.
by nobodywillobsrv 6mo ago
Re: High trust society general means people are pointing to some implicit unwritten structures that stop something from happening. Collective notions of shame, actual networks of friends and families that reinforce correct behaviour or issu
30.
by nobodywillobsrv 7mo ago
Of enemies. Of enemies. There are probably three modes of safety. Deploy tech to unknown group. Could be enemy could be friend. You disable it's abilities perhaps. If you deploy tech to friends you might enable more defense. Anthropic

More ›