nmjohn

5 ms·

1.
by nmjohn 9mo ago
> and paid for with your privacy (and probably your website user's privacy too)? That's not really how ssl certs work - google isn't getting any information they wouldn't have otherwise had by issuing the ssl cert.
2.
by nmjohn 10mo ago
It may also be interesting for people that browsers have a large list of domains they enable or disable certain behavior for a variety of reasons: https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/main/Source/We
3.
by nmjohn 2y ago
One of the standard link bypasses seems to work here[0] though. Is that not a reliable workaround here? [0]: https://archive.is/BYCjp
4.
by nmjohn 2y ago
Why are other news sources which also have paywalls not banned? (nytimes, wsj, bloomberg, financial times, etc)
5.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Why did he not want CVE's assigned?
6.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> And please don’t reply. Respectfully, if you don't want discussion, why comment in the first place? Commenting telling someone not to comment and then ending in telling them not to bother replying is confusing behavior to me for a
7.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> Note: Relies on Apple Silicon, and configured to only produce Apple Silicon builds. Just curious, what is relying on apple silicon?
8.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> I have no doubt we will see them attempting to aggressively exercise these in future years to shut down alternatives to Vision Pro in the future. Do you have examples where apple has aggressively used patents offensively like this?
9.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> because it implies that it should be necessary Who gets to decide what should or should not be necessary? Do you think your opinion about this is the majority view by people?
10.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> it’s borderline treason and should be prosecuted that way. Have words lost all meaning? This is the most absurd thing I've read all day. (And I promise I'm not even remotely defending the absurd situations you're referri
11.
by nmjohn 3y ago
While that certainly has been true for the majority of the last two years - rpi's in pretty much all skus have been back in stock for a few months now - to the point that even digikey has many of the skus in bulk stock See: https:&#x2
12.
by nmjohn 3y ago
What would your hypothetical egress arbitrage look like? Keep in mind we are specifically talking about cloudfront bandwidth - so being able to route to an upstream without that upstream also paying for bandwidth likely is not possible.
13.
by nmjohn 3y ago
In my experience pricing can go far lower than that. The sibling commenter saying $0.001/GB on an 18PB /year commit seems reasonable to me.
14.
by nmjohn 3y ago
If you can sign a yearly bandwidth commit (not sure what the minimum bandwidth requirement is, but 1PB / year may be in the ballpark) - you will get prices that are extremely competitive (maybe like 90%+ off base list pricing?)
15.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> was only 27 minutes... I was affected by the tunnel outage. It was down for closer to 3 hours, not 27 minutes. (Their status page does accurately reflect this time)
16.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Not sure if ublock updated their blocking rules to bypass the block or youtube stopped the experiment - but starting yesterday, I'm no longer seeing any adblock warning which previously had started blocking me (as opposed to originally
17.
by nmjohn 3y ago
The attacker effectively controlled the IP the domain was pointed to. If you have this, getting a cert issued from any CA is trivial - you've proved to them you control the domain in question.
18.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Yes, I was pointing out that many of their products have explicit limits. But more importantly, the second link I posted shows how that despite being "unlimited" - it's not uncommon for hetzner to throttle / close your a
19.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Your random blog post is the outdated one. Their actual docs: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/general/traffic/ And reports of throttling once you actually hit certain limits: https://lowendtalk.com&
20.
by nmjohn 3y ago
You can not get actual unmetered 1gb/s for anywhere close to that. If you start pushing anywhere close to that much bandwidth, you will be throttled / have your account closed. For example, Hetzner caps your bandwidth at 20TB per
21.
by nmjohn 3y ago
> Also "allow-list" is so gross. Maybe pick something less divisive for future examples. What is gross or divisive about that?
22.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Do you know what prevents people from doing that? Being able to get help for their problems. Do you know what doesn't? Forcing them to hide their problems so they are able to keep their job. The discussion isn't really about wheth
23.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Which apps have they done that to?
24.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Nope - having built out the SSL termination stack for a similar company - they are serving millions of commercial sites on their own custom domains with let's encrypt issued certs.
25.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Based on their 2021 (most recent year available) Form 990 (nonprofit public tax filing) [0] they paid Identrust $434,000 for "Internet Services." Not sure if they are getting more than just the cross-sign from Identrust - but it s
26.
by nmjohn 3y ago
I've read it numerous times after initial agreeing with you, and I don't think that is the case. To me it sounds like they are saying if declaring bankruptcy were that easy, nobody would be receiving child support because everyone
27.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Can you provide an example of an alternative service which will give higher than 4 nines for availability that an enterprise customer would pick instead if that < 1hr of downtime per year was too high?
28.
by nmjohn 3y ago
Child support generally can't be removed in bankruptcy
29.
by nmjohn 3y ago
This macOS update took < 30 seconds - opposed to most regular macOS updates which at the fastest are still 5+ minute operations
30.
by nmjohn 3y ago
He is worth like $40B - that $100m would be nothing compared to what they'll likely inherit

More ›