Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nmca
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nmca
1mo ago
It would be glorious if there was a split version!
2.
▲
by
nmca
8mo ago
I put a 5 dollar phone-holder-ring on the back of my kindle, problem solved.
3.
▲
by
nmca
9mo ago
In a maximally earnest way — to what degree should we be sure these language harms are real on net? Are there data as opposed to anecdata? (Of course many phenomena are real without data; we can just be more confident in cases with data)
4.
▲
by
nmca
10mo ago
This is also a nice way to combine the ratings of a number of noisy annotators with variable annotations noise.
5.
▲
by
nmca
11mo ago
This is not work by any of the high profile new hires, in case folks are confused.
6.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Lillian’s blog is extremely good in general & if it’s new to you I suggest checking out the other posts also. I particularly enjoyed the one on human data.
7.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
right, but you definitely shouldn’t be using any other formatter than ruff and this helps with that
8.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
It’s the same principle as: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Restaurant_Review-g60763-d477541...
9.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Isn’t the answer to the question just classic economies of scale? You can’t run GPT4 for yourself because the fixed costs are high. But the variable costs are low, so OAI can serve a shit ton. Or equivalently the smallest available unit of
10.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
You can dream of better yet! If the spec was required to be open source for the government project, then you could have commercial choices and some less feature rich open source version.
11.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
I feel the AI safety community has not made enough of Lehrer’s masterpiece on the topic: https://youtu.be/frAEmhqdLFs?si=DYsY5Juco-kJ5eWD
12.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Indeed, it’s like saying a jet plane can fly!
13.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
It takes Tim Gowers more than hour and a half to go through q4! (Sure, he could go faster without video. But Tim Gowers! An hour and a half!!)
14.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
It’s interesting that this is a competition elite enough that several posters on a programming website don’t seem to understand what it is. My very rough napkin math suggests that against the US reference class, imo gold is literally a one
15.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
There wasn’t in the CoT for these problems.
16.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Great follow-up work from OpenAI on this: https://openai.com/index/emergent-misalignment/
17.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Why is the method called sendOnce? It’s send with a capacity limiter / semaphore right, so what about it is Once?
18.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
This is great! I have daydreamed about how to do a more complex algo: instead of character speed and frequency you could do bi-character speed/frequency/error rate and probably improve over keybr further.
19.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
“bad” seems fine?
20.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
This article is quite bad: haughty in tone and confused in content. If you are interested in learning something about a key part subject matter (compounding loopholes and their impact on drug prices), this article is much better: https:&#x
21.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
How do you purport to know this?
22.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
I get motion sick more easily than most, and a Waymo is much much smoother than a typical uber driver. I am happy to pay a fairly large time&momey premium for this.
23.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
I saw your comment and counted — in May I took a Waymo thirty times.
24.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
One could train a language model to predict task difficulty (and other parameters) here, which would be great for the initialisation of new cards
25.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
with a bad ai it is pointless, with a good ai it is powerful. codex-1 has been quite good in my experience
26.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
It is a cost benefit trade off, as with all things. Benefits look pretty good.
27.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
Did you get help from ChatGPT ooi? The humour sounds a bit like modern ChatGPT style but it’s uncanny valley.
28.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
I think your threat model is bad — the isolation of accounts offers little and most people have effectively only the security of their email provider anyway. That said, buying several keys would be a natural and happy path solution for the
29.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
I know this was sarcasm, but bank card is not appropriate because you should have one hardware key for all services produced by an independent provider.
30.
▲
by
nmca
1y ago
You only need one, plus a couple recovery spares, in any sane implementation.
More ›