nipah

6 ms·

1.
by nipah 4mo ago
Okay, doubt. What level of complexity you believe this project has? Including the changes that required changing burn-cubecl. https://github.com/mii-nipah/voxcpm-rs --- Just to be clear, I'm not saying they don&#x
2.
by nipah 4mo ago
"rewrite 50% of what it generates" See, I'll not claim they write good code. But have you considered maybe your standards are a little bit too high for the tool? I made like 15 tools already using AI for my use, most of them
3.
Show HN: Universal Type Lens, it deals with the annoying inlay hints(marketplace.visualstudio.com)
3 points by nipah 1y ago|0 comments
4.
by nipah 1y ago
The second test scores 60%, the first was way higher. And I specifically said ""unless you are saying "I could not grasp it immediately but later I was able to after understanding the point" I think you and your friends
5.
by nipah 1y ago
Your view is incomplete. It did lowered lifespans, but also increased them MUCH MORE than before. It was not "oh, it got worse, now it is recovering". It was "it got worse, now it is much better than before". The amount
6.
by nipah 1y ago
If you should never say never, you are already contradicting yourself.
7.
by nipah 1y ago
You don't validate an hypothesis without testing counterfactuals, tho.
8.
by nipah 1y ago
Did you wrote it from scratch to compare? There's an old motto devs use all the time, you know. Measure first, don't guess. How do you know it would not have took you the same time or less to write the program if it was you? Or if
9.
by nipah 1y ago
700 lines of code is 2 weeks of work for a good developer? My friend, I wrote 350 lines of executable code (excluding boilerplate) in a morning (4AM to like 9AM, maybe a bit more) to make a test with voxel octrees like yesterday. There&#x27
10.
by nipah 1y ago
> This will only get better with time. Prove it.
11.
by nipah 1y ago
Your estimation maybe right, but maybe also there is a point on why it is right: https://neilmadden.blog/2025/06/06/a-look-at-cloudflares-ai-... Maybe because (and I'm quoting that article) it is still l
12.
by nipah 1y ago
Novelness is not a characteristic of interpolation, tho, it's about extrapolation. If you have plenty of clients and plenty of related stuff to the provider side, even if on on auth, then it could be considerably trivial for the LLM to
13.
by nipah 1y ago
quoting my own previous response: > Also, I mentioned mammals because those problems are of an order that mammals and even other animals would need to solve in reality for a diversity of cases. I'm not saying that they would literal
14.
by nipah 1y ago
No, I think I saw the graphs on someone's channel, but maybe I misinterpreted the results. But to be fair, my point never depended on 100% of the participants being right 100% of the questions, there are innumerous factors that could a
15.
by nipah 1y ago
You read at the same speed line-by-line your code when you are in your git client? You are doing something wrong. I go line-by-line through my code like 7x faster than I would do it for someone's else code, because I know what I wrote,
16.
by nipah 1y ago
> It's not just time spent typing. Figuring out what needs to be typed can be both draining and time consuming. It's often (but not always) much easier to review someone else's solution to the problem than it is to solve i
17.
by nipah 1y ago
Now you are just being silly with your comparisons. There is no analogy between those things: * the difference between handwritting a book and typing is the extreme pain you would feel in your hands versus being able to write more in the sa
18.
by nipah 1y ago
Amazing, because I realized I procrastinate MORE when using LLM to write code which I know I could write. And not only that, I feel I'm losing the ability to do the coding myself and solve the problems myself when delegating this to th
19.
by nipah 1y ago
I have a very simple question with like, 5 lines at best, that basically no model, neither reasoning or simpler could grasp. For obvious reasons I'm not disclosing it here (because I fear data contamination in the long run), but it bas
20.
by nipah 1y ago
"most people I show them too have issues understanding them, and in fact I had issues understanding them" ??? those benchmarks are so extremely simple they have basically 100% human approval rates, unless you are saying "I co
21.
by nipah 1y ago
I don't think two wrongs make a right, tho. Looking down at formal education is not the same as embracing anti-intellectualism. And while I admit the software industry is absolutely full of bullshit anti-intellectualism, I also don&#x2
22.
by nipah 1y ago
I'm sorry, 2000 USD per month is MUCH more costly than an engineer from a third world country, it can basically pay for a senior where I live. Even 200 USD is sufficient for an intern here. The problem with your point is that it's
23.
by nipah 1y ago
> What’s clear is this tech is here now, and complaining about it feels a bit like mourning the loss of punch cards when terminals showed up. Just stop with this, it's bulshitty. There's nothing related between LLMs and the mig
24.
by nipah 1y ago
We have some hints to be skeptical on the prospect, I would say. Like the fact we can't even explain an everyday phenomena all humans experience like consciousness. If you don't understand a common phenomena that (supposedly) occu
25.
by nipah 1y ago
Or that it is, like most people working in projects like those believe without first proving.
26.
by nipah 1y ago
Sabine believes in superdeterminism, so it is her own position, not an universal one, nor a very popular one amongst physicists. It is VERY hard to say quantum physics is deterministic. And the studies you are citing are famous for being ex
27.
by nipah 1y ago
Except that the brain is not predictable at all, this is one of the first things you would know. You can say the definition of free will is not "consistent", but my problem is deeper and more reasonable: People just assume for no
28.
by nipah 1y ago
Why there is nothing rather than nothing? This is, I fear to tell you, IMPOSSIBLE to explain by other than methaphysics, it is an uncloseable "gap" that humanity will never solve. As far as I know, it's not about gaps, it&#x2
29.
by nipah 1y ago
This is a strawman, but it also could be the case of it being something supernatural. You don't have the skill to enter in a serious discussion about that either, so calling it "magic" is the unique thing will help you here (
30.
by nipah 1y ago
This is just partially a solution, because this assumes cognition as a whole is computable.

More ›