Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
niom
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Masking behaviors are strongly correlated with worse well-being and increased mental health issues (generally depression, suicidial ideation and attempts).
2.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Mental health. Haven't seen it mentioned yet. Never think of yourself as wrong, invalid, defective or unworthy. That's wrong. Don't do it. For about 90 % of my life I've thought about myself as defective in many ways.
3.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Figuring I can be a bit more open since it's a throwaway account (edit - this kinda escalated) I lost eighty pounds in a year with that body image "trick", but that's only half the story at best. That's what I desir
4.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
I've struggled with depression and anxiety issues for most of my life. Two things have made a huge difference for me: Actually identifying with my body and taking care of me (it). That's the diet, sleep, exercise combo driven by a
5.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
I suppose it's kinda cliché but "start living authentically". Coming out, doing that thing where you meet people not for work, stuff like that. I cheated and started working on this a few months ago though. Oh and get a bette
6.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Ancient acceptance of MSM generally depended on who did the penetrating, because in a nutshell penetrating was manly and A-OK while being penetrated (orally / anally / vaginally) was womanly and hence bad. MSM was an exercise of s
7.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
The "trans/gay/lesbian is cool now" explanation doesn't hold a lot of water to me. If I had the choice to not be gay, I wouldn't be. Life would be so much easier, emotionally and otherwise. Sex would be lower r
8.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Yes. Outright bans and persecution of homosexuality is relatively new. Effeminate gays were practically eradicated, Europe had the Nazis do it, the US had the lavender scare (because gay=communist), the Soviets under Stalin did much like th
9.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Why would you need hacking for that? Classic https://xkcd.com/538 nerd imagination. Simply seize some devices and place the incriminating evidence on them. Or just place a device with incriminating evidence among other seiz
10.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Warrants are not a high a hurdle in practice when they are needed. The US has the third-party doctrine, so all information you've communicated to someone does not need a warrant unless otherwise protected. In the US you need to establi
11.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
The root cause is impressionable subjects accepting priors from questions into the set of priors used to reconstruct memories. Formulating good questions that contain as few priors as possible is difficult, and the reaction of the interroga
12.
▲
by
niom
4y ago
Of course nobody with a court order on your doorstep is going to take your word for anything. If the object of the order is to find some data, anything and everything that looks vaguely digital will be taken (consequentially, every physical