niltecedu

4 ms·

1.
by niltecedu 8d ago
Its not there because a lot of the providers werent providing until recently, and higher spatial resolutions, referesh times and higher compute costs meant that no one used them in prod. We tried with ECMWF-AIFS however ENS + IFS was bettte
2.
by niltecedu 8d ago
One is a AI company first, the other has tons of other services and they can just buy those outright.
3.
by niltecedu 19d ago
Everytime someone is using httpx I always wonder why use that especially when niquests exists? I feel like it has always been such a better package
4.
by niltecedu 19d ago
Also niquests as well which is a dropin replacement and imo wayyy better than httpx
5.
by niltecedu 21d ago
idk man, we pay stupid amounts of money to microsoft, we are an enterprise customer, expecting better availablity compared to my laptop isnt really a high bar.
6.
by niltecedu 2mo ago
My company is not even the same ballpark, but even we already have people for it. And doesn't include the fact that you can get a colo location and just a MSP or a contractor to do it for you
7.
by niltecedu 2mo ago
For not being stuck at any shenanigans that might happen at East Croydon.
8.
by niltecedu 2mo ago
Its gatwick, 3 lines go here, one every 15 minutes. I have always taken the train to either Heathrow or Gatwick, there's always been more than enough space to accomodate luggage, idk what people here are on about.
9.
by niltecedu 3mo ago
>But in general now trend is to use normal databases from IT world in OT world to overcome some legacy solutions. Someone tell my company this please ;-;
10.
by niltecedu 3mo ago
Based on us keeping a replica of our AVEVA data archive in delta tables which are just parquets; and only compressing the parquets in LZ4 and getting a fuck ton of more space savings. I would say yes. Especially when you're onprem with