nickodell

9 ms·

1.
by nickodell 5y ago
Are non-sequiturs always malicious? For example, suppose you have a news site, and it has a story about Ukraine, followed by a story about school shootings. Even if two links next to one another are unrelated, that doesn't prove that t
2.
by nickodell 5y ago
Alex Oh worked for a law firm which represents Exxon. That law firm was accused of obstructing a deposition to avoid providing answers to the other side. [1] >ORDERS defense counsel to show cause by May 14, 2021 why sanctions should not
3.
by nickodell 6y ago
Stingrays are more useful as an investigative tool than an evidentiary tool. DNA is the other way around.
4.
by nickodell 6y ago
Believe it or not, I was already aware of all of those things, having followed a number of criminal defense blogs. If you read the article and appellate decision which is linked, it says what I just said: >On Wednesday, the appellate cou
5.
by nickodell 6y ago
>taking the life of an innocent The prosecutor isn't unilaterally deciding whether the DNA evidence is valid. There will be a public hearing where both the prosecution and defense show evidence about the validity of the DNA evidence
6.
by nickodell 6y ago
>My prediction: this firm will probably try to get removed from the case, rather than open source their shitty code. That isn't necessarily their choice. The prosecutors will make the decision about whether to withdraw the DNA evide
7.
by nickodell 6y ago
Why couldn't you attach to the screen, press Ctrl-C, then press up arrow to get the original command?
8.
by nickodell 6y ago
That's a thoughtful answer; thank you.
9.
by nickodell 6y ago
>First, the client makes an unauthenticated request to the server to retrieve the password salts associated with the username. If no user is found, an error is returned to the client. If a user is found, the server sends the client the u
10.
by nickodell 6y ago
I was looking for a more technical response. e.g. How are new blocks created? Proof of work, predefined functionaries, something else? You say you have SPV proofs which allow a full node to prove a particular domain is owned by a particular
11.
by nickodell 6y ago
How does your service differ from NameCoin?
12.
by nickodell 6y ago
The article also suggests that COVID was maybe an inside job, and that it's unpatriotic to follow health restrictions. (Not in exactly those words, but it warns about "acquiescing" to government restrictions.)
13.
by nickodell 6y ago
Apple says they're going to move to an HTTPS based system, so the relevant comparison is between HTTPS and DNS, not HTTP and DNS.
14.
by nickodell 6y ago
Then the question is, "how much do I trust my ISP/DNS provider?" Those DNS lookups tell your ISP 1) that you use a mac and 2) that you have an application from a specific developer installed. I think I trust my ISP less than
15.
by nickodell 6y ago
So what happens if a removed function is called? Or can you guarantee that won't happen?
16.
by nickodell 6y ago
Note that minority shareholders have some rights, though this varies by state of incorporation: (PDF warning) https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=F20...
17.
by nickodell 6y ago
It's 90 days, and they renew it when there are 30 days left.
18.
by nickodell 6y ago
This doesn't seem to work that well. If you type invalid syntax, like '.[' then the window suddenly resizes to accomodate the error message, but not all of the text boxes resize. jiq is probably a better tool.
19.
by nickodell 6y ago
>It's therefore trivial to have both protocols coexist, even on the same UDP port, without any negotiation whatsoever. You simply need to discard packets that don't decrypt, which is what WireGuard already does. If both ends wi
20.
by nickodell 6y ago
>In contrast, a hypothetical WireGuard protocol v2 can offer just two suites, the old one and the new one, with simple advice: use the new one if you can, and allow the old one for old nodes until they’re upgraded. There’s nothing unusua
21.
by nickodell 6y ago
Under C11, the compiler is still allowed to assume termination of a loop if the controlling expression is non-constant and a few other conditions are met. https://stackoverflow.com/a/16436479/530160
22.
by nickodell 6y ago
That unprivileged user will not have the SSH host key, which will create a warning for any user who connects, just as though someone had conducted a man-in-the-middle attack. Of course, there are plenty of privileged ports to choose from.
23.
by nickodell 6y ago
Here's the vulnerability: <html> <script> var total = ""; for (var i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { total = total + i.toString(); history.pushState(0, 0, total);
24.
by nickodell 7y ago
That's a very good point, and thank you for correcting me.
25.
by nickodell 7y ago
Is it really possible to remove the side channels? Even if you formally prove that it does not access memory outside of authorized regions, that doesn't prevent it from speculatively accessing unauthorized memory. We've seen Spect
26.
by nickodell 7y ago
In the case of the Uber crash in Tempe, the car did kick the decision over to a human operator. However, it did so 1.3 seconds before impact. This wasn't enough time for the human to assess the situation and decide what to do.
27.
by nickodell 7y ago
>What about anti-semites? What about subtle racism (Is that even something we want to moderate?) It's not clear to me that xHamster actually tries to remove that from their site. I wonder if this is just a case where the media repor
28.
by nickodell 7y ago
>> The Church executed no one. From the Wikipedia article you mention: >A number of procedures and protections restricted the torture of the accused, although much torture could be inflicted, and capital punishment was executed by
29.
by nickodell 7y ago
>So if you've been paying attention to Purism's website and do some digging, you'll realize that they've never actually [filed a Social Purpose Report] >I filed a complaint with the State Attorney of Washington ove
30.
by nickodell 7y ago
Or, less cynically, reduction of the number of fires.

More ›