nicewood

6 ms·

1.
by nicewood 7mo ago
Cool - I can imagine myself using this. We usually use a local supabase for developing and playwright for UI validation tasks, could your sandbox accomodate this too?
2.
by nicewood 8mo ago
Over here in Europe, it's pretty laborious to get a firearm legally and yet 3D prints for that are not discussed at all. It's surprising to see discussions and bills like these, when there is the second amendment in place. What is
3.
by nicewood 8mo ago
Yes, If the low code solution has a good interface for LLMs. There are enough low code / no code solutions with a pure graphical interface and nothing else. Dinosaurs.
4.
by nicewood 1y ago
It will just iframe whatever page/app you would have been browsing anyway but potentially with ChatGPT directly being able to operate on the App state. So if configured, I guess ChatGPT will be just a handy middle layer to your usual i
5.
by nicewood 1y ago
True. Although worth mentioning that there is tooling and (e.g. Playwright) MCPs around this. But definitely not integrated well enough!
6.
by nicewood 1y ago
Nice one, I thought I need this and wanted to build something like that too couple weeks ago. But the more I worked with Claude, I felt like *I am the bottleneck* and not the waiting times. Also waiting for more than (really max) 5 minutes
7.
by nicewood 1y ago
I only know the old Github Copilot (like 2yrs+ ago) so cannot speak to it directly, but even the Cursor Agent (with Sonnet 4 or GPT-5) is IMO inferior to Claude Code (CC). In my experience, it is faster and better performing. CC seems to
8.
by nicewood 1y ago
It might look like you initially, but then some sites might block you out after you had some agent runs. I had something like this after a couple local browser-use sessions. I think simple interactions like natural cursor movements vs. dir
9.
by nicewood 1y ago
When using spec writter and sub-tasking tools like TaskMaster, Kiro, etc. I've experienced Claude Code to take 30-60+ minutes for a more complex feature
10.
by nicewood 1y ago
I think it's less about the code output, but about the process of humans iterating and adjusting the LLM-drafted requirements and design. Claude Code et al. are good enough, the bottleneck is IMO usually the context and prompt by now.
11.
by nicewood 2y ago
I agree that the OS vendors are in a great position to add value via broad, general purpose features. But they cannot cover it all - it's breadth over depth. So I think the innovation for niches and specific business processes will be