ni10c

5 ms·

1.
by ni10c 23d ago
Thanks for these thoughts. Super insightful and appreciated
2.
by ni10c 24d ago
Author here. It’s ironic because this post was clearly geared towards non-hackers. But now that we’re here.. the other analogy I considered presenting was: harness = chassis, model = engine, fuel = tokens, agent = car I’m curious what y’all
3.
by ni10c 24d ago
Can you be more specific regarding unfriendliness?
4.
by ni10c 24d ago
Author here. I think our website could be much clearer - but Pi is fundamentally easier to mold than other harnesses. It’s not magic but it strikes the balance well of letting you shape it extensively without letting you break it.
5.
by ni10c 24d ago
Author here. Thanks - I appreciate the feedback
6.
by ni10c 5mo ago
Colin from Earendil here. Will be up to us to prove whether we can become a Company Tolkien would be proud of.
7.
by ni10c 2y ago
I don’t think it ever says wholly owned. My understanding is that the three founders have donated their shares to the Foundation, but they didn’t own 100% of the company. Likely >50% but not 100%
8.
by ni10c 2y ago
Feels to me after reading the article they earnestly try to do their best to offer privacy enhancing alternatives and push back often. What percent of these requests do Meta, Google or Microsoft fight? Ratios like that matter Proton is extr
9.
by ni10c 3y ago
The missing web-scale API for identity and access control
10.
by ni10c 5y ago
I nod in fierce agreement. True words
11.
Radicle: A Peer-to-Peer Stack for Code Collaboration (In Beta)(radicle.xyz)
5 points by ni10c 6y ago|0 comments
12.
Ironman Spotted Above LA(nytimes.com)
1 points by ni10c 6y ago|0 comments
13.
Containous Traefik Labs(techcrunch.com)
3 points by ni10c 6y ago|0 comments