nextn

5 ms·

1.
by nextn 1y ago
Link three is largely a list of scientific papers that show the effectiveness of Ivermectin and Fenbendazol in curing cancer. You laughing your ass off triggers alarms.
2.
by nextn 1y ago
off-topic: hi dang. Can you help me understand why this got flagged? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44246859 FWIW, when potentially live saving content gets flagged on HN, effectively censoring it, I can't help b
3.
by nextn 1y ago
You're being a bit gratuitously negative, which is against HN rules, considering the magnitude of the potential impact of this work. Ivermectin won the Nobel Prize. "First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Pro
4.
by nextn 1y ago
In case it saves a life, some papers report Fenbendazol cures some cancers. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-overlooked-miracle-drug-fo...
5.
by nextn 1y ago
It isn't.
6.
Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole(rifttv.com)
2 points by nextn 1y ago|0 comments
7.
by nextn 1y ago
In case it saves a life, some papers report Fenbendazol cures some cancers. https://x.com/MakisMD/status/1845353670407233817 https://x.com/skymeds_store/status/1919695848222687548 https
8.
by nextn 1y ago
Does not restoring the tax deduction for software dev in the US help solo founders who don't draw salary to compete with large businesses?
9.
by nextn 1y ago
> That assumes the vendor runs a buy-back scheme. That would cost What would it cost? The vendor runs software that sells tickets. The same software can buy tickets back, invalidate the ticket IDs, and issue new tickets with new IDs. Thi
10.
by nextn 1y ago
Congratulations on finishing this. If you were to do this again, how would you organize the source code differently?
11.
by nextn 1y ago
You don't permit ticket transfers. Instead you sell tickets back to the venue for the price they were bought. Your tennis buddies would better be ready to buy the ticket from the venue 1 second after you sold it back to the venue, else
12.
by nextn 1y ago
It's a question of price. No bot can afford a fee that increases exponentially based on the number of views. Similar to quadratic voting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_voting
13.
by nextn 1y ago
Use quadratic post fees. The larger the number of people who try to view a post, the larger the fee becomes or the post stops being viewable. So the fee isn't a one-time fee, but an "open" fee that keeps increasing. Another m
14.
by nextn 1y ago
Anyone who sells is a scalper. This is easy to notice. You can't go around saying "I've got two front row" when the mere act of saying it gets you noticed. You can't post online you're selling tickets because i
15.
by nextn 1y ago
If you resell, you're a scalper. If you return the ticket to the venue/band, you get your money back, get the bond back, and you're not a scalper. Charging the ticket buyer the price of the bond doesn't only harm the fan
16.
by nextn 1y ago
An option I'd like to see implemented is to make the customer put down a bond. Besides charging the customer for the ticket, also charge them another higher amount that gets refunded x days after the concert. If the customer is found t
17.
by nextn 1y ago
> It's basically impossible. Require a fee to post.
18.
by nextn 1y ago
I ran into the same problem. Built a web app too to fix this that tracked ghost jobs and misbehaving companies. Nobody used it. People will better use this app, lest they find themselves in the same situation, laid off, with no one to turn
19.
by nextn 1y ago
A different payment policy for ads, similar to stacker.news, is worth exploring.
20.
by nextn 1y ago
Have ad publishers pay users, instead of pay ad companies. Instead of make an ad that already consumes the visitor's attention to also consume their cpu, and this to enrich the ad-tech company, consider making a website pay the visitor
21.
by nextn 1y ago
> well, the comparison is quite far off the track: Might not be that far off the track. A post on X says "US Military Intelligence leaders (MJ-12) didn't like this idea because it would antagonize the Extra Terrestrial Biologic
22.
by nextn 1y ago
To stay relevant. Big platforms don't have an incentive to pay users. They collect the ad revenue themselves. Possibly because big platforms agreed among themselves to behave this way. It only takes one big platform to start paying use
23.
What if we made advertising pay the user?
7 points by nextn 1y ago|13 comments
24.
by nextn 1y ago
Why don't we all decide to start paying for software? We pay for software indirectly when buying an iPhone or Mac.
25.
by nextn 1y ago
It wouldn't shock me if an email services monopoly/duopoly would prefer email spam's only workaround to be signing up for their services, instead of fixing the root of the spam problem.
26.
by nextn 1y ago
Sorry, I didn't clarify something. Require a fee to deliver email. If the email is deemed legitimate by the recipient then refund the fee. > No, they will happily pay money to spam you It's a question of price. They can't
27.
by nextn 1y ago
Spammers are worse at something no one tried to use AFAIK: require a fee to deliver email.
28.
by nextn 1y ago
There is at least something at risk if you work on something people start to use because people start to have expectations about it continuing to be useful. They want bugs fixed, new features, the project not to die, etc. One risk is you ma
29.
by nextn 1y ago
> Sending it to them isn't. You don't know that across all candidates. And you can get paid for sending it. "they did not appear to be good enough" is very useful feedback for me compared to no feedback. Especially wh
30.
by nextn 1y ago
In some open source projects you have to deal with stakeholders, work with a known set of requirements and deal with organizational and time constraints.

More ›