neversupervised

6 ms·

1.
by neversupervised 2mo ago
Im sorry to hear about your situation. Have you blogged about it? I’m curious about how the volume of your type of work has been changing over the past 2-3 years.
2.
by neversupervised 3mo ago
This just feeds a certain narrative and allows people to take exactly the wrong conclusion. Just because there’s some uncertainty at the edge, it doesn’t change where things are going.
3.
by neversupervised 4mo ago
Years of experience don’t correlate to output in all careers. Surgeons and engineers get better over time. This might not be true for all jobs. Meanwhile, management is naturally capped because every manager necessarily needs people to mana
4.
Ask HN: Can someone help me understand the AI vibes on HN?
2 points by neversupervised 4mo ago|1 comments
5.
by neversupervised 4mo ago
This is not how people use LLMs. If you ask one of these questions you’d get a longer answer, often grounded on the internet. I speculate that conditional on a smart human operator interpreting the results, such interpretations across vendo
6.
by neversupervised 4mo ago
This is just a glitch in time. It’ll be agents talking to agents. We won’t be able to keep up.
7.
by neversupervised 4mo ago
Check out Pangram
8.
by neversupervised 4mo ago
It’s completely wild to me that lifelong programmers come into contact with agentic coding and come to the conclusion that their jobs are safe for one reason or another. AI will definitely be able to write entire software, inclusive of figu
9.
by neversupervised 5mo ago
This is a great way to become well-versed in benchmarking.
10.
by neversupervised 5mo ago
Terminal Bench is the future
11.
by neversupervised 5mo ago
But this is the good kind of goalpost moving
12.
by neversupervised 5mo ago
That paper focuses on breaking the harness, the same hack applies to all tasks. Here we are breaking tasks individually. If these were put on a different, more secure harness, most of the exploits would still work.
13.
Show HN: Terminal-Wrench, a dataset of 331 realistic hackable environments(github.com)
6 points by neversupervised 5mo ago|2 comments
14.
by neversupervised 5mo ago
This is nonsense. I’m sorry. AI will completely upend the workplace and the economy. Whether that’s self evident today in the numbers in the way that we track those numbers, which is based on how things have historically worked, is not rele
15.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
I've been a contributor and reviewer for terminal bench since last August, and this post is about what I've learned designing and reviewing tasks. The guidance is broadly applicable to anyone building an agentic benchmark.I would
16.
How to Make a Good Terminal Bench Task(twitter.com)
3 points by neversupervised 6mo ago|1 comments
17.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
Can you explain what you think will happen, actually? People at OpenAi and Anthropic aren’t longer coding by hand. Are you saying everyone changes their mind and goes back? Not gonna happen. You have to work around this new constrain.
18.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
The author’s intuition is still backward calibrated, even though he talks about the future. He doesn’t have an intuition for the future. All code will be AI generated. There’s no way to compete with the AI. And whatever new downsides this b
19.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
There’s no reason a company should put up with enemies within. In rare instances a disgruntled employee might be able to make a positive contribution. In most cases, even if the employee has valid reasons, by the time they are disgruntled t
20.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
The mistake is that 1 every N waves of hype are in fact monumental shifts and it makes sense to embrace as soon as possible. Also being early to the right thing can have massive implications in appreciating the shift before the general publ
21.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
I don't oppose reading AI generated content in principle, but because it's free to generate, I always am less likely to read super long prose that is AI generated. So the question is whether someone has taken the time to keep it a
22.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
UBI will likely be necessary but that won’t appease society. Everyone wants to have a chance to climb the ladder. If it becomes self evident that humans can no longer have a meaningful impact on their outcome, there’ll be riots whether they
23.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
The goal has nothing to do with you being employed. Your job security is a consequence of the ultimate goal to build AGI. And software development salaries and employment will be affected before getting there. In my opinion, we already past
24.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
It’s crazy how some people feel the ai and others don’t. But one group is wrong. It’s a matter of time before everyone feels the AI.
25.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
I think you’re a bit behind on your world view. Just because it’s inconvenient to you that non coders can now code, doesn’t make it untrue.
26.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
Tell more. Crawling is not a new idea. How did they abuse you?
27.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
Is it good? This will almost certainly fail. Not because Yann or Europe, but because these sort of hyper-hyped projects fail. SSI and Thinking Machines haven’t lived to the hype.
28.
by neversupervised 6mo ago
Interesting bifurcation between developers that get energized by AI coding and those that feel depressed. Only one side will come out on top, even if it’s for a limited time.
29.
by neversupervised 7mo ago
I find these to be cute, romantic almost. But I have never found anything worth borrowing. I wonder what is the real impact in terms of additional books read. I do love the concept of spreading knowledge in the neighborhood. I'd be cur
30.
by neversupervised 7mo ago
And yet this other HN article right below shows otherwise https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/this-14-year-old-i...

More ›