neverokay

15 ms·

1.
by neverokay 1y ago
It’s not about whether the person knows or not. It’s more about that the person can’t believe this is happening even if it follows all the norms that we’re all supposed to know about, apparently. In other words, just because such a system c
2.
by neverokay 1y ago
Because they are long-running discussions, it’s not repetitive. When we allow Rust or JS threads to keep popping up, it’s because we evolve with the topic over time and continuously discuss it. What the HN shadow mod team is doing is killin
3.
by neverokay 1y ago
The thing is they want to make the point DEI went too far. If they are finally getting to the “we ourselves have gone too far”, then they may put in a black woman to show some type of capitulation without giving up moral superiority. That’s
4.
by neverokay 1y ago
What compelled you in jail? I’m asking if there was more to it than just being bored.
5.
by neverokay 1y ago
A face to face meeting in a bunker. But seriously, we pondered the psychological damage of those who are drone operators. How is this different? There should be more ceremony when making decisions like this, not an afternoon group chat. Dre
6.
by neverokay 1y ago
Semantics. By knowing what meat to reveal amongst a group of tigers, you can effectively moderate the feeding frenzy. Some meat you keep hidden, lest they go nuts on each other for it. Now I guess, should this be made transparent?
7.
by neverokay 1y ago
It does really feel like we are men watching our women and children accosted. We feel impotent as the public currently.
8.
by neverokay 1y ago
If you want to put a tinfoil hat on, one could argue external state actors could have convinced the Trump admin their provided forms of communication are tapped, so they should consider alternatives. Such a state actor would know the altern
9.
by neverokay 1y ago
The DoD or Pentagon don’t have their own messaging apps? Maybe our government doesn’t spend enough on tech. To me this is the same as if this were happening on Zoom or Discord, since these are not exactly world war level apps. Finally, the
10.
by neverokay 1y ago
The syntax looks better than some languages and frameworks.
11.
by neverokay 1y ago
2. The affective-emotional component: how much does the pain hurt, and how does it affect emotional state? I am going to add the spiritual aspect to this. I read a post on Reddit asking if Jesus truly suffered more than anyone else on ear
12.
by neverokay 1y ago
I’m not asking you if you read carefully. This is not to be mean, I asked the GP specifically because they demonstrated that they understand the spirit of what I am talking about. Your own confusion is stemming from something else, not my q
13.
by neverokay 1y ago
No.
14.
by neverokay 1y ago
I suppose at the end, when you have a discussion with God about why you did the things you did and try to explain yourself, a few rounds of conversation will have had you surrender your prior beliefs. In a sense, there’s no argument agains
15.
by neverokay 1y ago
That’s the thing about the GP. In a sense, this poster is actually hallucinating. We are having to “correct” their hallucination that they use an LLM deeply.
16.
by neverokay 1y ago
It does this even if you give it instructions to make sure the code is truly in the code base? You never told it can’t lie.
17.
by neverokay 1y ago
Well, are we willing to do serious moral training? For example, if you make Elon Musk live with a family that relies on Medicaid, would that be sufficient to convey the experience to such a person? Moral training requires exposure and being
18.
by neverokay 1y ago
Do you think leaders should have moral training? And if so, how would such training be provided? Ytcombinator itself maybe deficient in providing moral guidance, but this just one anecdote. What does it say about our mentors and community l
19.
by neverokay 1y ago
Kind of makes you think, that all those ancient texts about greed, corruption, temptation, lust, and so on, was all real. Truly real, those things are here at scale and always have been. Just echoing your post, but, some things need to be e
20.
by neverokay 2y ago
Maybe. I think users will be largely in control of their context and message history over the course of decades. Context is not being stored in Gemini or OpenAi (yet, I think, not to that degree). My one year’s worth of LLM chats isn’t actu
21.
by neverokay 2y ago
Being able to ask a question in human language and get back an answer is the single most useful thing that LLMs have to offer. I’m gonna add: - I think this thing can become a universal parser over time.
22.
by neverokay 2y ago
3/5 Major American political topics enter the chat.
23.
Ask HN: Ego Death
1 points by neverokay 2y ago|2 comments
24.
by neverokay 2y ago
Seems like they need to do this for the paywalls.
25.
by neverokay 2y ago
There's one scheduled, and paid for, to launch fairly soon, but with no spare capacity Stupid question of the day, can we not just force jam a bunch of astronauts into it?
26.
by neverokay 2y ago
Once AI becomes a political spending topic like green energy, I think we’ll see nation level spending. Just need one medical breakthrough and you won’t be able to run a political campaign without AI in your platform.
27.
by neverokay 2y ago
If you mostly generate static content, is the way to go to abuse free tier cdns?
28.
by neverokay 2y ago
Gemini also only charges for output tokens, not sure if that’s considered. All in all this is something I was looking for or was roughly going to do to compare costs. Cool stuff.
29.
by neverokay 2y ago
At about a gram a day.
30.
Ask HN: How much marijuana do you smoke/eat/vape?
4 points by neverokay 2y ago|8 comments

More ›