neoveller

7 ms·

1.
by neoveller 11y ago
Two views, both for the full length, give or take.
2.
by neoveller 11y ago
The last one likely matters the most, at least in my case. Ambitious ideas take more time than just product development/implementation. Marketing and business development run on much lengthier schedules. At half a year in on savings, I
3.
by neoveller 11y ago
As someone who tried to run such a service years ago, I mostly agree. Even the very best stories written through this method were troublingly self-inconsistent. On the other hand, they were often hilarious a well. We published a few antholo
4.
by neoveller 11y ago
Good man. Thanks!
5.
by neoveller 11y ago
Nothing here so far. Wonder if YC forgetting/glitching about me is worse than a rejection email or not?
6.
by neoveller 11y ago
Do late applications get late rejection email?
7.
by neoveller 12y ago
Does anyone know why the live footage looks like it was taken using a security camera from the 80s?
8.
by neoveller 12y ago
Think I just found a way using canvas with a semi transparent element inside of it, then overlaying that on each square, grabbing the computed/resulting color of the canvas to decipher which block is what. S O O N
9.
by neoveller 12y ago
I spent an unfortunate chunk of time trying to auto-click all the red square via jquery in chrome console. After a lot of reading and experimenting, I can verify that the exploit is thoroughly addressed (so far), and I cannot achieve my goa
10.
by neoveller 12y ago
If someone built one of these mobile webapp frameworks using famo.us, but exposed it to the developer as something much less alien vs actual famo.us... I would be so happy.
11.
by neoveller 12y ago
I winced, because it seemed like the kind of pep-talk speech you might have to hear over and over again when you get called into a very high-level meeting without any discussion about execution, in the middle of a workday where you have cod
12.
by neoveller 12y ago
Glad to see this out. I've been waiting on famo.us to become available for quite a while now. Exciting stuff. Now, where is the documentation? The readme from the repo points to a docs folder that does not exist, and links to the onlin
13.
by neoveller 13y ago
Have you read the issue? The problem is that the current way things are done requires manual merge requests because of merge conflicts resulting from the updated userlist array. The github api method is 1:1 with the requirements of joining
14.
by neoveller 13y ago
> Really? Yeah, I get that it not being a microtransaction-pile-of-garbage probably helped, but did you play it? Seriously, nobody at the beginning could have thought it was good. After the buzz, quality isn't relevant. I learned ab
15.
by neoveller 13y ago
Already solved same-day: https://github.com/larvalabs/pullup/pull/11 But never implemented / merged. Surprised the powers-that-be are resisting the most elegant solution. Then again, I came up with it, s
16.
by neoveller 13y ago
Added the proposed auth method. Still awaiting merge for previous pull request: https://github.com/larvalabs/pullup/pull/11
17.
by neoveller 13y ago
Still waiting on my first pull request to get merged (msied).
18.
by neoveller 13y ago
The step of just adding yourself to the userlist seems ill-conceived. Automatic merges are just going to overwrite the last person added unless manually merged. Can I propose this just use github for authentication, and only allow those on
19.
by neoveller 13y ago
How does this differ from Verbling (YC S11)?
20.
by neoveller 13y ago
Agreed. Also, this looks way more like a case where the author mis-structured his data for his intended use case, and is blaming the tool instead of the skill level used to implement it. Nesting deeper than one level in a document is rarely
21.
by neoveller 13y ago
The users who are upboating. Do you want to be one of 5 supporters, and then get emailed to use a product with just the other 4? If it doesn't reach 200+, there's also somewhat more incentive for the author of the idea to use the
22.
by neoveller 13y ago
It's not a simple "yes, it's valid". It's a "yes, I like it, and if you make it, I'm going to be among your first users." And suddenly, it's built, and 200+ users auto-appear.
23.
by neoveller 13y ago
It probably won't at this rate, TBH. But as of now, the only way to find out is to launch.
24.
by neoveller 13y ago
Have an HN upboat, sir. I think you hit on a point I wasn't even thinking nearly enough about. I naturally enjoy hearing out ideas and knowing my feedback is heard, but I overlooked the possibility of that being uncommon. Light incenti
25.
by neoveller 13y ago
1. Good call. 2. A widget is an awesome idea. Move aside, LaunchRock! 3. You're the man. Thanks! Monetizing? Apps aren't expensive, and if it provides value to a community I certainly wouldn't mind not-charging for it. It too
26.
by neoveller 13y ago
I'm not sure what angle you're asking this from--the originator of the idea, or someone who might want to use a service? Regarding the former, that's answered in the OP, so you probably mean the latter. A) Why do you browse H
27.
by neoveller 13y ago
You got it!
28.
by neoveller 13y ago
I agree. I'm pleasantly surprised (shocked?) at the lack of negativity in the comments thus far.
29.
by neoveller 13y ago
You, sir, are the voice of reason. I'm pushing an update now that removes those conditions.
30.
by neoveller 13y ago
I just need enough permissions to know that you have > 0 repos, public or private. I didn't see anything between just-email and all-the-things in their oauth docs, but I might've missed something while rushing through. Do you k

More ›