nemonemo

8 ms·

1.
by nemonemo 14d ago
Isn't this basically the mythical man-months LLM edition?
2.
by nemonemo 21d ago
What do you think EB visas are: immigrant visas or work visas? Answer: they are both.
3.
by nemonemo 1mo ago
Isn't a literal "moat" about temporary deterrence? I can imagine makeshift bridges could permanently make the moat useless.
4.
by nemonemo 3mo ago
Maybe in 10 years when the tech matures, but IMO now seems a bit too early to have a tech like this. It is like intelligence without evolution or progress.. yes it can be used in some niche markets, but difficult to be generic.
5.
by nemonemo 4mo ago
Just like any useful tools, there would be an expert super tool user who could probably generate enough profit based on the tools. The majority would not profit from it in the long run (the monopolistic tool makers would reap any profit fro
6.
by nemonemo 6mo ago
Not sure what you mean by "it", but the doubled usage would be 18h a day.
7.
by nemonemo 6mo ago
Yes, it overlaps well with the market open time. But I thought Claude was good with coding... Does this mean major trading agents write code using Claude to make trading decisions? Or Claude models are relatively better than other models in
8.
by nemonemo 9mo ago
One thing I don't understand is how come Gemini Pro seems much cheaper than Gemini Flash in the scatter graph.
9.
by nemonemo 9mo ago
Fair point. Asked Gemini to suggest alternatives, and it suggested Gemini Velocity, Gemini Atom, Gemini Axiom (and more). I would have liked `Gemini Velocity`.
10.
by nemonemo 10mo ago
The danger of short form videos is because the form enables the algorithm designer to artificially maximize the reward with minimum effort by the viewer. It doesn't matter whether you watch kitten ones initially. After watching it for
11.
by nemonemo 11mo ago
Have you considered a case where English might not be the authors' first language? They may have written a draft in their mother tongue and merely translated it using LLMs. Its style may not be many people's liking, but this is a
12.
by nemonemo 11mo ago
What you are obsessing with is about the writer's style, not its substance. How sure are you if they outsourced the thinking to LLMs? Do you assume LLMs produce junk-level contents, which contributes human brain rot? What if their cont
13.
by nemonemo 11mo ago
Are you saying human brain is kind of similarly vulnerable to well-crafted facts? Does it mean any intelligence (human or non-human) needs a large amount of generally factual data to discern facts from fakes, which is an argument toward AIs
14.
by nemonemo 1y ago
Agreed in principle, but has anyone seen any practical difference between these DNS services? What would be a more detailed downside for using these in parallel instead of the ISP default as a fallback?
15.
by nemonemo 1y ago
Wikipedia article about Consciousness opens with an interesting line: "Defining consciousness is challenging; about forty meanings are attributed to the term." Perhaps "consciousness" is just a poor term to use in a scie
16.
by nemonemo 1y ago
How can writing marks help in this regard? I can imagine a language with both a lot of exceptions and writing marks.
17.
by nemonemo 1y ago
We need to balance the benefit and the downside of the limited liability in corporations. If innovation no longer becomes beneficial for the society and only beneficial for a small number of people, perhaps the society may need to reconside
18.
by nemonemo 1y ago
Thank you. Updated my comment again.
19.
by nemonemo 1y ago
The answer says "For rings in which division by 2 is permitted". Is there the same constraint for AlphaEvolve's algorithm? Edit2: Z_2 has characteristics 2. Edit: AlphaEvolve claims it works over any field with characteristic
20.
by nemonemo 1y ago
This sounds like a great idea, but how do you keep it from being "drained" or hydrated?
21.
by nemonemo 2y ago
Wouldn't you say the same thing for most of the people? Most of the people suck at verifying truth and reasoning. Even "intelligent" people make mistakes based on their biases. I think at least LLMs are more receptive to the
22.
by nemonemo 2y ago
According to the Martial Law Act, there's an extra power by the martial law commander to move the military as they want. Some translations say "guarding martial law" instead of "precautionary": https://el
23.
by nemonemo 2y ago
Could you please point out the specific lines you are dissatisfied with? Is it something an additional publication cannot resolve? Additionally, in case you forgot to answer, what is your wish for the future of this line of research? Do you
24.
by nemonemo 2y ago
> direct comparisons in Cheng That's the ISPD paper referenced many times in this whole thread. > Stronger Baselines Re: "Stronger baselines", the paper "That Chip Has Sailed" says "We provided the commit
25.
by nemonemo 2y ago
> Direct comparisons from the last 3 years show that AlphaChip is worse. Do you have any evidence to claim this? The whole point of this thread is that the direct comparisons might have been insufficient, and even the author of "The
26.
by nemonemo 2y ago
We're not just talking about academia—Google's AlphaChip has the potential to disrupt the balance of the EDA industry's duopoly. It seems unlikely that Google could easily secure the policy or license changes necessary to pub
27.
by nemonemo 2y ago
The UCSD paper says "We thank ... colleagues at Cadence and Synopsys for policy changes that permit our methods and results to be reproducible and sharable in the open, toward advancement of research in the field." This suggests t
28.
by nemonemo 2y ago
Thank you for your thoughtful response. Acknowledging potential biases openly in a public forum is never easy, and in my view, it adds credibility to your words compared to leaving such matters as implicit insinuations. That said, on page 8
29.
by nemonemo 2y ago
In the conclusion of the article, you said: "While I concede that there are things the ISPD authors could have done better, their conclusion is still sound. The Nature authors do not address the fact that CMP and AutoDMP outperform CT
30.
by nemonemo 2y ago
Do you have a past example where this already-proven theorem/new tools/objects would have been only possible by human but not AI? Any such example would make your arguments much more approachable by non-mathematicians.

More ›