negus

7 ms·

1.
by negus 8mo ago
Sounds dystopian. I hope projects like OsmocomBB and Purism Librem will shape the future
2.
by negus 1y ago
In Russia ECH is already banned by the state censorship. Even before RFC is published
3.
by negus 2y ago
Not surprised, considering UK's ridiculous key disclosure law (United Kingdom The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), Part III, activated by ministerial order in October 2007, requires persons to decrypt information and
4.
by negus 2y ago
Are you proposing to drown mercy and forgiveness in bureaucracy? Corruption is a valid point generally. And this question can be raised when discussing pardon for president's family. But is this point valid for this specific case, for
5.
by negus 2y ago
Yes. And this is the reason ScyllaDB exists
6.
by negus 2y ago
> Lao Tzu teaches: the best fighter is never angry. More important than the blow is knowing when to strike Seems like a fake citation https://www.taoistic.com/fake-laotzu-quotes/fake-laotzu-quot...
7.
by negus 2y ago
I would like to work with you. Asking searchable things may be considered disrespectful to one's time
8.
by negus 2y ago
seems like a subtle ad for a company mentioned in the first paragraph. would be funny to know if the whole post is written by a LLM
9.
by negus 2y ago
What you mean here is actually deps pinning + vendoring. It's way out of scope of basic CI concept.
10.
by negus 2y ago
Thank you for the hint about the business phone registered in a call redirect service.
11.
by negus 2y ago
Do you think that this risk is bigger than you business being hit by the market?
12.
by negus 2y ago
Cmon, will you complain to a composer that there is a song about love already?
13.
by negus 2y ago
> It's not adding anything helpful -- it's quibbling over words. That depends on the context. If I come to the paint store I would be surprised if I'm offered either black OR white paint. As If I can not buy and use both,
14.
by negus 2y ago
In my opinion it is too literal understanding of the concept and there is no universal borderline in size or scope. It is common in practice to find quite fat microservices because their maintaners decided it doesn't worth to have yet
15.
by negus 2y ago
I mostly use statically linked monorepos with microservices. The services use the common utils from the repo. What's the difference except for not having dead code and unused dependencies in the artifacts in my case?
16.
by negus 2y ago
Any arguments to support this claim? What's the difference then? If there is three communicating servces: first has 90% of the business logic, second has 7%, and the last one has 3%. Should we call the first one a monolith? And if they
17.
by negus 2y ago
A monolith is just one microservice. Is there a choice to be made? "We love monoliths so much so we have dozens of them"
18.
by negus 2y ago
TLDR: I'm not too good with the infrastucture (and this couple of teams also), so you should also go on steam engines. Of cource it highly depends on the skills of the team. In a startup there could be no time to learn how to do infras
19.
OpenTofu removes Russian cloud providers integration from the repo(github.com)
5 points by negus 2y ago|0 comments
20.
by negus 2y ago
And what would be better? France?
21.
by negus 2y ago
https://matrix.org/ ?
22.
by negus 2y ago
> get shown reports of CSAM and then turn a blind eye to it and do nothing about it. How do you know this is the case?
23.
by negus 2y ago
But this very same situation with Pavel's arrest aligns with your criteria of "authority-pissing" tech. Have you checked the source of Telegram? https://telegram.org/apps#source-code
24.
by negus 2y ago
See my comment above about the unencrypted backup. It's basically a UX tradeoff: You can not promote default E2E + no autobackups -- people in mass are not ready to lose their data when losing the device. Nor they are ready to store t
25.
by negus 2y ago
And non E2E chats by default is an intentional design desision. Pavel previously gave comments about these tradeoffs: In some sense it is better design than Whatsapp's e2e by default BUT 99%+ users have an automated backup to an un-e2
26.
by negus 2y ago
> (ignorant of the history that led to 2008) can you share your version please?
27.
by negus 2y ago
> Proton Mail for example built it's business around privacy Around the claim regarding privacy. But have you tried to sign up without providing some other email address or a phone number? https://www.wired.com/story
28.
by negus 2y ago
You are right, even now on my Linux laptop poweshell process takes 100-200ms to start while bash takes 5ms. But these problems you mentioned are a specifics of a particular implementation, not the approach (objects instead of text processi
29.
by negus 2y ago
Why haven't you decided to stick with the object-oriented shell like PowerShell does?
30.
by negus 2y ago
Please, make me think otherwise. With numbers and proofs

More ›